Search Results

1. Zaheed v REAA Registrar [2013] NZREADT 107 [pdf, 65 KB]

   ...Mr Zaheed and weighed the evidence the Tribunal were not convinced that the Registrar’s decision was wrong. Mr Zaheed has not discharged that onus on him. The reasons are: (i) That he has not shown us that he understands fully and accepts responsibility for the offending. He lacks insight into the fact that his offending was wrong and injurious to his staff and New Zealand as a whole. The Tribunal has no evidence to confirm that payment of reparation has been completed. (ii)...

2. Selwyn v Hobson (2011) 18 Taitokerau MB 1 (18 TTK 1) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...with an ahu whenua trust order for the primary purpose of enabling Henry Rangitawhiti Hobson (Junior) and Angela Keung to build a house on the land; and (e) Sections 220 and 222 appointing Henry Rangitawhiti Hobson (Junior) and Angela Keung as responsible trustees of the Maxwell’s Grant Lot 4A Ahu Whenua Trust and vesting Maxwell’s Grant Lot 4A in them. 18 Taitokerau MB 5 [13] Orders will also be needed to address access. This depends upon whether the Hobson whanau de...

3. CAC20003 v Cooper [2013] NZREADT 44 [pdf, 26 KB]

   ...future) is also appropriate in Mr Cooper’s case. [13] Mr McCoubrey submits that, even taking account of the mitigation aspects raised by the defendant, this was a deliberate breach of a pivotal provision of the Act which, should be met with a firm response. Previous Relevant Cases [14] In paragraph [9] to [11]] of our decision, we referred to three cases where a licensee wrongly dealt with monies in a trust account, namely CAC v Downtown Apartments Ltd (in liquidation) & Ano...

4. LA - Reference - Supervised provider - Part 3b [pdf, 536 KB]

   ...development Provide an explanation: Cannot comment on this skill area provide a comment to support your rating: communicating with clients a supervised provider of legal aid services should, under supervision: • Inform clients of their rights and responsibilities and give timely, appropriate and sufficiently detailed advice and explanations to the client to enable them to make an informed decision about the matter. From your experience with the applicant please state your level...

5. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Sensible Sentencing Group Trust (Application by NZ Herald for Access to Tribunal File) [2013] NZHRRT 20 [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...and [74] and Peters v Birnie [2010] NZAR 494 (Asher J) at [21] to [25]. [3] The parties, having a right to be heard on the application, were invited by Minute dated 29 April 2013 to advise whether the application was opposed. In formulating their response they were invited to consider (inter alia) s 107 of the Human Rights Act 1993 and IHC New Zealand v Ministry of Education (Non-Party Access to Tribunal File) [2013] NZHRRT 2 (31 January 2013) and Adoption Action Incorporated v Attorney...

6. Media release and annual provisional suicide figures for 2010/11 [pdf, 457 KB]

   ...on from last year when this type of information was first made publically available by Judge MacLean. In releasing the information Judge MacLean said that although Coroners were not experts in suicide prevention, the coronial system has a legal responsibility and a pivotal role to play in stimulating discussion on issues that could help the explanation and prevention of suicide in New Zealand. “The suicide toll is a really concerning commentary on our society, and I believe anythi...

7. [2015] NZSSAA 54 (13 August 2015) [pdf, 28 KB]

   ...that XXXX’s condition should be reassessed or reviewed at a later date. [5] The appellant was sent a review form on 31 December 2013 with a request that it be returned by 23 February 2014. A further reminder was sent on 29 January 2014. No response was received from the appellant and the review forms were not returned by 23 February 2014 as requested. The payment of Child Disability Allowance was suspended from 23 February 2014. [6] The appellant sought a review of decision....

8. ENVC Matiatia expert witness acoustics addnl 2014 [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 Page I 01'5 IN THE MATTER OF a Notice of Motion under s87G of the Resource Management Act 1991 JOINT EXPERT WITNESS STATEMENT IACOlJSTICSI III This signed joint witness statement is written in response to the Court's direction from the 20lh October 2014 which directed conferencing between the experts on the acoustics and vibration issues where full agreement had not been reached. This requires that the experts seek to identify...

9. [2013] NZEmpC 195 Harrisons Fine Art Ltd v Carrothers [pdf, 65 KB]

   ...not be required to give security for costs. A litigant in receipt of a grant of legal aid is required to carefully manage the expenditure of the grant and no less so than he or she would that party’s own funds. There are arguably additional responsibilities on the grantee who is not free, for example, to indulge in litigation on matters of principle or for other tangential motives as may self-funded litigants. [12] Turning to impecuniosity, I agree that impecuniosity alo...

10. E v B & C LCRO 30 / 2009 (19 May 2009) [pdf, 16 KB]

    ...the Standards Committee in respect of his complaint against Prosecutor B and Prosecutor C. Complainant E’s complaint arises from a criminal conviction. He considers that he was unjustly convicted and he holds Prosecutor C and Prosecutor B responsible for failing to correct an injustice that occurred. The Standards Committee was of the view that the allegations against Prosecutor C and Prosecutor B could not give rise to a finding of unsatisfactory conduct which breaches the...