Search Results

Search results for response.

15758 items matching your search terms

  1. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 AC evidence chief John Cawley replaced [pdf, 2.4 MB]

    ...detract from my opinions. SCOPE OF EVIDENCE 11. This Statement of Evidence covers the following: (a) A summary of my evidence (Executive Summary); (b) An overview of the key points from my Report (Previous Report); (c) Response to issues raised in the Applicant's evidence (Response to Applicant's Evidence); (d) Comments on draft conditions and proposed mitigation (Conditions / Mitigation); and Page 4 31547615:629148 (e) Conclusio...

  2. October 2016 National Pānui [pdf, 275 KB]

    ...Gabriel Charles O'Brien Healy Tokaanu Township 21 Trust - Enforce the obligations of a trust 9 12:05PM A20160004213 240/93 Paul Edwards, Benjamin Severne, Manu Kerehoma Ökahukura 8M2C2C2B - Reduce trustees on removal of Julia Chambers as a responsible trustee and Bob Te Ahuru as an advisory trustee Whiringa-ä-nuku / OCTOBER 2016 - NATIONAL PÄNUI 3 At Whanganui | Mäori Land Court, Ingestre Chambers, 74 Ingestre Street, Whanganui Tuesday 18 October 2016 | Judge L R Harve...

  3. [2021] NZEnvC 079 Guthrie v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 2.1 MB]

    ..._________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT _________________________________________________________________ A: The appeal is declined. B: Costs are reserved. Any application for costs is to be filed within 10 working days and any responses within five working days of receipt of any application. Contents A Appeal and Proposal 5 B The issues to be resolved 6 C Statutory matters 6 D Relevant planning documents...

  4. Yates v Te Kohanga Trust - Te Kohanga Lots 1, 3-16, 24 and 27 (2013) 63 Taitokerau MB 299 (63 TTK 299) [pdf, 224 KB]

    ...reserves (s 61). The Trust as an administering body could limit public vehicular access, though not in respect of owners of the lots. Public access by foot could also be restricted (s 23). Similarly, the Trust as administering body would have sole responsibility for controlling earthworks on Lot 1. [34] In response to submissions for the Director-General, counsel emphasised that the purpose of the s 181C order was to provide access for Lots 2-26 and not access for the general pub...

  5. NZCASS: estimating the costs of crime in 2003/04 New Zealand [pdf, 150 KB]

    ...I S C L A I M E R The views, opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Working Paper are strictly those of the author(s). They do not necessarily reflect the views of the New Zealand Treasury. The Treasury takes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in, or for the correctness of, the information contained in these working papers. The paper is presented not as policy, but with a view to inform and stimulate wider debate. W P 0 6 / 0 4 |...

  6. Broome v Auckland Council [2017] NZWHT Auckland 1 [pdf, 328 KB]

    ...adjudication of the claim. THE PARTIES [20] When the claim was heard the Council was the only remaining respondent. During the course of the claim there were four respondents. These were: (a) Auckland Council, the territorial authority responsible for processing and issuing the building consents, inspecting the building work and issuing the CCCs after the work was completed. (b) Equus, which was joined by Procedural Order 2 following an application by the Council. It wa...

  7. 2021-03-24 OWRUG - DOC v ORC (C28-2002) [pdf, 1.2 MB]

    IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND $‘I r=- \ r’_“: :; ; i Ll I : I--5; i ,~ i i,,,’ i $ j ++ -I, i \ b-_- Decision No. C ALg /2002 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of a reference pursuant to Clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act MINISTER OF CONSERVATION (Part RMA 583/00 Mining Privileges) Referrer OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Environment Judge J A Smith Environment Commissioner I G C Kerr Environment Commissioner N Burl

  8. Landpro - EiC - C E Bright - Hydrology (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 275 KB]

    ...submission sought that PC7 be rejected entirely, including Schedule 10A.4. 2 Landpro Limited Submission on Proposed Water Permits Plan Change (Plan Change 7) to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (4 May 2020). 6 General Matters 19 In response to the evidence in chief of Mr de Pelsemaeker3, it is necessary to make some general comments where assertions made relate to technical hydrology. 20 Para. 44 of Mr de Pelsemaeker’s evidence summarises the five significant...

  9. [2024] NZEnvC 017 Aarts v Waikato District Council [pdf, 1.8 MB]

    ...allow more people to live near Tuakau town centre with its employment opportunities; • The proposal will give effect to Objective 6 as it will be an example of a local authority decision on urban development which is integrated, strategic and responsive given the consistency with strategic planning documents (such as Waikato 2070 and Future Proof 2022) and responds to the demand for housing; • The proposal will give effect to Objective 7 as the decision to rezone the land is in...

  10. Evaluation of Legal Aid reforms June 2011 [pdf, 185 KB]

    ...Disagree Strongly. There were also questions to ascertain respondents’ awareness of changes occurring in the justice system, their experience of courts, and the personal and household characteristics of the respondents to help contextualise the responses to the six statements. A third (33%) of respondents reported that they had heard of, or read about, changes to the justice system recently. Twenty-eight percent were unsure and 39% had not. A third (33%) of respondents had sought...