Search Results

1. Wang v Fu [2016] NZIACDT 38 (8 August 2016) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...complainant did not authorise Mr Fu to do so. [4.5] Mr Fu lodged two requests for visas under section 61 of the Immigration Act 2009; Immigration New Zealand refused them. 3 [4.6] On 16 December 2015, Mr Fu wrote to the Authority in response to this complaint and said that: [4.6.1] he submitted the request for Immigration New Zealand to reconsider their decision to decline the work visa on 10 January 2015; and [4.6.2] on 25 January 2015, he obtained instructions f...

2. National Standards Committee 1 v Reed [2021] NZLCDT 31 (2 December 2021) [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...Willingness to participate fully in the investigative process, and to acknowledge error or wrongdoing where it has been established, may demonstrate insight by the practitioner into the causes and effects of the wrongdoing. This, coupled with acceptance of responsibility for the misconduct, may indicate that a lesser penalty than striking off is sufficient to protect the public in the future. [188] For the same reason, the practitioner’s previous disciplinary history may also assume...

3. Trustees-Role-and-Duties.pdf [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...trustee’s key role is to maximise the assets and minimise the liabilities of the trust to the best of their ability and within the law. Trustee powers, rights and obligations are set out in the trust order3. An elected trustee formally becomes a responsible trustee when the Court has granted an order of appointment. General functions of a trustee Te Ture Whenua Māori Act requires that every person who is appointed as a responsible trustee must carry out the: • terms of the trust �...

4. LCRO 69/2020 CX v DW (21 July 2021) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...cannot be bothered with me. I feel that he is not looking after my welfare. [8] She adds:3 I have told DW that I want action, there is always a excuse. No money, legal aid, he lets it laps, not enough time, he is busy & more. Mr DW’s response [9] Mr DW traverses the steps taken by himself, assisted by Mr FU,4 to obtain satisfaction of the judgment debt for Ms CX. [10] Mr DW denies being rude to Ms CX. He says:5 I have not been rude to Ms CX, on the phone or at any ti...

5. MOJ0217.2E_SEP22_WEB.pdf [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...trustee’s key role is to maximise the assets and minimise the liabilities of the trust to the best of their ability and within the law. Trustee powers, rights and obligations are set out in the trust order3. An elected trustee formally becomes a responsible trustee when the Court has granted an order of appointment. General functions of a trustee Te Ture Whenua Māori Act requires that every person who is appointed as a responsible trustee must carry out the: • terms of the trust �...

6. OIA-120850-part-1.pdf [pdf, 872 KB]

   ...community detention)? e. How many people received a sentence of a fine? f. How many people were ordered to come up for sentence if called upon? g. How many people were convicted and discharged? h. How many people were discharged without conviction? In response to question 1, please refer to Table 1 attached. This provides the number of people with finalised charges for selected theft offences, by offence type, from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2024. In response to questions 2a-g, please...

7. Tangitau v Hakaoro [2015] NZIACDT 27 (17 March 2015) [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...then: [2.1] Failed to report to his client when he lodged the agreement, [2.2] Failed to deal with Immigration New Zealand’s proper inquiries, [2.3] Failed to tell his client Immigration New Zealand declined her application, due to the lack of response to the inquiries, [2.4] Lodged an appeal without instructions, and [2.5] Failed to report to his client when this Tribunal cancelled his licence. [3] Mr Hakaoro has not responded to the complaint with an explanation or justificati...

8. R v D LCRO 56 / 2009 (19 June 2009) [pdf, 17 KB]

   ...$89,000 said to be owed to Complainant R’s mother by an estate. Lawyer D acts for the estate. Complainant R’s mother’s solicitor, Mr XX, had written on a number of occasions to Lawyer D with regard to repayment of the debt, and when no response was forthcoming, Complainant R’s mother wrote to the Law Society complaining about Lawyer D’s failure to respond. [3] The Standards Committee considered the complaint on 1 April 2009, and particularly noted (a) that Lawyer D h...

9. [2017] NZEnvC 201 Matakana Coast Trail Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   ...When preparing the detailed design and before providing it to Council. for certification under 139D, the consent holder shall provide the proposed detailed design drawings to Auckland Transport and the Matakana Coast Trail Trust for comment. Any responses are to be provided within 20 working days. 1390. The consent holder shall provide the detailed design, which shall include details of the responses received, and how this has been Incorporated into the design, or the reasons why an...

10. Martelli v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 409) NZREADT 18 [pdf, 301 KB]

    ...no ability to comment or communicate on the same, to the REAA to specifically refute the allegations with respect to the issue of [keys and alteration of an email] .. [10] The application further asserts that it may be that there were other responses from other licensees such as Te Puke Real Estate Ltd which may not have been provided to the appellant for comment. In the application, it is further proposed that: 8. The evidence of Anita Martelli will be supplemental to and in...