15760 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2025] NZDT 192 APPLICANT BL RESPONDENT TF The Tribunal orders: TF is ordered to pay BL a sum of $632.50 by 22 May 2025. Reasons: 1. BL (“BL”) and TF (“TF”) were in a relationship and living together at a rented house in [Suburb] (“the house”). 2. The tenancy agreement for the house named BL as the main tenant and TF as a reside
...after end of hearing but before judgment (1) This rule applies after a proceeding or an application has been heard but before judgment has been given. (2) A party may file a memorandum seeking leave to make further submissions. (3) The Judge responsible for the judgment may grant leave to a party to make further submissions. [15] Exceptional circumstances that warrant accepting further submissions may include a new argument that could not be anticipated by the date of the hearin...
...the Court dismissed the appeal by the appellant, Edmond Chalecki. [2] By memorandum dated 16 October 2025, the Corporation claims costs against Mr Chalecki on a Category 1B scale in the sum of $2,794.00 calculated as follows:2 • Item 22 – Response to appeal – 2 days 1 Chalecki v Accident Compensation Corporation [2025] NZACC 164. 2 While the Corporation considers there would be justification in seeking increased costs, if not indemnity costs, and that it is entitled t...
...Wellington in the previous month and been busy organising accommodation and employment and needed to speak to a lawyer about her appeal. [3] On 7 October 2025, Judge Clark issued an Initial Minute which directed that the Corporation provide a response to Ms Gray’s application to file the present appeal out of time. [4] On 24 October 2025, Mr Castle for the Corporation submitted that it did not oppose the appeal out of time, but suggested that the University of Auckland, in its...
...Mr Wanhalla submitted that his appeal was filed late mainly because of his serious health issues, combined with a severe brain injury. [2] On 20 October 2025, Judge Henare issued an Initial Minute which directed that the Corporation provide a response to Mr Wanhalla’s application for leave to appeal late. 2 [3] On 28 October 2025, Mr Nightingale for the Corporation submitted that it opposed leave being granted on account of the appeal being filed materially late, the revi...
...reflect Maori interpretations: that is the prerogative of kaumatua and claimant historians. This survey is to be seen as a first attempt to provide a context within which particular claims may be located and developed. The Tribunal would welcome responses to this report, and comments should be addressed to: The Research Manager Waitangi Tribunal PO Box 5022 Wellington iii Morris Te Wbiti Love Director Waitangi Tribunal LIST OF CONTENTS Note: Chapters 1 to 6 were written by...
...Police lay a formal charge, the Youth Court deals with most young offenders.3 Children and young people are usually not ‘Convicted’ of offences in the Youth Court. If an offence has been ‘Proved’ through a Family Group Conference process, a Response (or Order) may be given in the Youth Court if the offending was serious, or if the agreed plan has not been followed sufficiently. Only one of the many orders available to the Youth Court results in a conviction, and that is reserved fo...
...alternative positions within the company outside the laboratory and to avoid a summary dismissal immediately before Christmas. The company said, however, that the investigation and its findings would have to be disclosed to any manager who might be responsible for Mr Te Stroet in an alternative position. [17] The Authority concluded that the defendant’s explanation of “panic” on 22 November 2009 was “treated with some cynicism” by Fonterra management. The Authority found...
...foreseeable that, when faced with them, the plaintiff would resign. [41] First, there was the failure to adequately, promptly and proactively deal with the clear personality difficulties between Ms Williams and Ms Toumadj. It was an insufficient response to require them both to try and sort it out between themselves. [42] Secondly, there was the inadequate communication to other staff at Newmarket that some flexibility in hours was being afforded to Ms Toumadj. Of course there...
...at 102. 12 Cracknell v Treaty of Waitangi Fisheries Commission (1993) 91 Wairoa MB 152 (91 WR 152) at 161. 13 Deed of Mandate – Ngati Rehua – Ngati Wai ki Aotea Trust, 23 November 2009, clause 3. 115 Taitokerau MB 52 [44] In response, Mr Webster, for the Trust, argues that the proposed settlement does not involve the transfer or return of interests in Māori customary land or Māori freehold land. Mr Webster rejects that the applicant has been unable to obtain evid...