Search Results

1. [2025] NZEmpC  223 McGearty v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 387 KB]

   ...above, Captain McGearty says that despite his formal request not being made until early 2018, Air NZ was on notice of his individual position on the ARP issue prior to 2017. [28] This is consistent with Air NZ’s evidence that in late 2017, in response to renewed requests from ARPs to be accommodated on the wide-body fleet, the international rostering and scheduling committee (RSC), made up of representatives from Air NZ, NZALPA and the other union representing pilots, Federation o...

2. [2019] NZEnvC 133 Darby Planning Limited Partnership v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 25 MB]

   ...objectives of the amending proposal; and (ii) would remain if the amending proposal were to take effect. (31) Annexure 1 to this decision summarises QLDC's two related resolutions ('Resolution A', 'Resolution B'), provided in response to our direction following opening submissions.29 As can be seen: 28 29 (a) Resolution A excluded from Stage 1 of the review some seven ODP zones, together with the Registered Holiday Homes Appendix, and the ODP's af...

3. NZCVS Core Report Cycle 1 (2018) [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   Key findings Descriptive statistics May 2019 Results drawn from Cycle 1 (March - September 2018) of the New Zealand Crime and Victims Survey 2 Content List of figures ...................................................................................................................... 5 List of tables .......................

4. Regulatory Impact Statement Crimes Act Part 8 Offences Against the Person 1961 Amendment Bill [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...upper, limit has been used to estimate the number of beds required. 10 additional beds will be required. The above analysis therefore suggests 10-50 extra beds as a result of these changes. This estimate does rely on judges becoming more severe in response to changes designed only to be reclassifications – it is quite likely that the numbers would not reach that level. In terms of the prison forecast, the change would be a „one-off‟ change, adding the extra beds from about a y...

5. [2007] NZEmpC CC 17/07 Inner City Interagency Trust v Howard [pdf, 27 KB]

   ...already been the case. Conversely if the stay is not granted, it would almost certainly result in the closure of the centre. This will injuriously affect not only the Trust but also those individuals who rely on the service it provides. [11] In response, Mr Twomey provided from the bar, there being no affidavit filed in opposition, but the information not challenged by the Trust, that the defendant is a solo parent and she has been declined legal aid. He referred to outstanding...

6. [2007] NZEmpC WC 20A/07 Gaskin v Grenside [pdf, 32 KB]

   ...out in that determination. Costs [30] Mr Ogilvie has asked for these to be reserved. If they cannot be agreed, he is to file a memorandum as to costs within 28 days of this judgment. Mr Gaskin will have 14 days following that to make any response to the costs application. C M Shaw JUDGE Judgment signed at 4pm on 27 September 2007

7. [2011] NZEmpC 88 Katz v Mana Coach Services Ltd costs [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2011] NZEmpC 88 WRC 42/10 IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN BEATRICE KATZ Plaintiff AND MANA COACH SERVICES LTD Defendant Hearing: On the papers (in response to memoranda filed on 7 and 22 June 2011) Counsel: Tanya Kennedy, counsel for the plaintiff Blair Scotland, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 18 July 2011 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A D FORD Introduction [1] In my substa...

8. [2011] NZEmpC 166 Hepburn v Huhtamaki Henderson Limited [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...students; (ii) Travel to Europe “to visit the students”; (iii) They had “hosted six young overseas nationals”. It is alleged that the information particularised amounted to a breach of the Court’s non-publication order. [8] In response to the plaintiff’s application, helpful memoranda were received from counsel for the Dominion Post and counsel for the defendant. [9] Counsel for the Dominion Post, Mr Stewart, noted that the Authority’s decision referred to the...

9. [2011] NZEmpC 124 Amien v Reipen and Others interlocutory [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...affidavit that he has no assets within New Zealand to discharge the obligation created by such an undertaking. His counsel argued that it would be inappropriate to require the applicant to provide security as the first and second respondents were responsible for his impecuniousity. In a telephone directions conference, however, I indicated to counsel that pursuant to r 32.6(5) of the High Court Rules, the Court required the applicant to provide security in the sum of $10,000 and t...

10. [2011] NZEmpC 126 EBIIWU v Norske Skog Tasman Ltd [pdf, 67 KB]

    ...plaintiff will either file a further affidavit including any agreements that had not been located at the time the earlier affidavit was sworn or an agreed statement of facts dealing with these issues. c) The defendant may file affidavits in response within 14 days of receipt from the plaintiff of any further affidavit or, if there is to be no further affidavit, within 14 days of receipt of such advice. d) The parties have agreed to accept a fixture on Friday 25 November 2011....