Search Results

1. F Ltd v O Ltd [2023] NZDT 374 (28 July 2023) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...Ltd RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: O Ltd is to pay F Ltd the amount of $470.00 by 18 August 2023. Reasons 1. This dispute arises from work done by BQ of F Ltd for O Ltd. F Ltd seeks $990.00 from O Ltd for that work. In response, SO of O Ltd says that there was no agreement for BQ or his company to do any work for his company, and O Ltd does not owe F Ltd any money at all. 2. The issues to be determined in this matter are: (a) What (if anything) was agr...

2. 2023-09-20-Joint-Memorandum-re-oustanding-issues-timetable.pdf [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...Equestrian Advocacy Group (KEAG) (together the Equestrian Parties) are counted as one section 274 party. BF\64286191\1 Page 3 (iii) John Brown; (iv) Jan Windleburn; (v) Rochelle Murray-Apatu; (vi) Sarah Hodge (added here as awaiting a response); and (vii) Te Ao Tūroa Environmental Centre (Rangitāne o Manawatū) whose issues will be covered by Siobhan Karaitiana). (d) Counsel for Waka Kotahi understand the following five parties do not intend to present at the heari...

3. ND v EI and others [2023] NZDT 241 (11 April 2023) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...removal and installation costs; $230.00 for the replacement and installation of a new towel rail; and a refund of the $45.00 Disputes Tribunal filing fee. 4. ND acknowledges that while she named CI as a respondent, she does not now believe he is responsible to pay the compensation she is seeking. 5. The Trustees deny the claim, saying they have made a range of concessions in ND’ favour since the agreement was entered into, the value of which far outweighs the amount she claims. 6...

4. IN v BI [2023] NZDT 345 (18 July 2023) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...BI should pay all or part of the costs sought? Was there a partnership agreement such that BI is contractually liable to pay half of any funding deficit on the project? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 6. IN contends that BI was responsible for further fund-raising from the outset so that there should have been no deficit at the end of the project. However BI denies there was any such discussion or agreement. She says that at the joint meeting at the start with both...

5. DG v NQ [2023] NZDT 139 (4 April 2023) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...to either of these possibilities. A diagnosis from a qualified person might, for example, have resulted in a finding that only an element required replacing. NQ’s actions prevented a reliable diagnosis being made and, in my view, he must bear the responsibility for that. [18] I do not think it makes any difference whether NQ passed on to his friend the money that DG paid him. The friend was not a party to any agreement with DG. [19] For these reasons, I consider that NQ is obliged...

6. FC & KC v X Ltd [2023] NZDT 478 (28 August 2023) [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...for their originally planned return to NZ from [Country 3] at the end of December and that seat availability for last minute travel to NZ from [Country 1] or [Country 2] were extremely limited. The Travel agent also thanked X Ltd for their prompt responses to her queries. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 8. X Ltd accepted that the Applicants had both contracted Co-Vid-19 but X Ltd required medical evidence to support that they were medically unfit to join the cruise at the e...

7. BM & OT v OE & DE [2023] NZDT 459 (5 July 2023) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...reasonably suspected defect, the vendor (including through its agent) cannot make a statement that suggests otherwise. If asked, he may not make any false or half truthful statement. 8. After carefully considering all the evidence I find that the response to the applicants’ question was at least a false half-truth and constitutes an actionable misrepresentation. There was at least a reasonably suspected defect that should have been disclosed to the agent and then on to the applican...

8. KH v NK [2024] NZDT 277 (24 April 2024) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...his company name. I accept the evidence of KH that he and TF decided to put the bus in the company name as it was parked on the road at TF’s home, but ownership remained with KH. As discussed at the hearing, the registered person or company are responsible for the vehicle, but this is not the same as legal ownership. 15. Ultimately, unless KH made false or misleading statements, or failed to answer questions truthfully and accurately, and it has not been proven that he did, t...

9. NZCVS 5 years brochure Web [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...talking to New Zealanders, here’s what we’ve found. justice.govt.nz/justice-sector-policy/research-data/nzcvs * Unless otherwise stated, the statistics in this booklet represent pooled findings from the first five years of the survey using responses collected from 2018–2022. The findings about young people, LGBT+ and disabled people remain true when controlling for other key demographic factors such as age and gender. NZCVS data is available for researchers through the Stats NZ...

10. Parole Mandatory Completion of Rehabilitative Programmes Amendment-Bill [pdf, 347 KB]

    ...case manager completes a comprehensive assessment interview with the person to identify their rehabilitation and reintegration needs. Using this information the case manager then develops a sequenced, prioritised plan to meet the identified needs (responses to risks) for that person. The case manager then manages the plan proactively throughout the sentence to ensure the offender is able to complete the required interventions, often by assisting the offender to resolve barriers to rehabi...