Search Results

1. New Zealand Law Society v YJ LCRO 201 / 2010 (11 April 2011) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...confidence in the provision of legal services and to recognise the status of the legal profession. [5] The Practitioner was informed of the review application and invited to respond within a stated time frame. The Practitioner did not forward any response to the review application but consented to the review proceeding on the papers. [6] Both parties have agreed that the Application may be determined without a formal hearing and therefore in accordance with section 206(2) of th...

2. Urban Development Bill Advice [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...requires Kāinga Ora to provide certain rating information to territorial authorities if land within a project area is subject to urban development rates. We understand that such information will enable these territorial authorities to fulfil their responsibilities for rates under the Bill and the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002. In addition, each relevant territorial authority must provide Kāinga Ora with access to the authority’s rating information database. Kāinga Ora may use the...

3. Bowden v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) and Bloemendal [2018] NZREADT 48 [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...size if you submitted a house plan showing compliance with all relevant aspects of the District Plan (not the new Auckland Unitary Plan) for both the existing house and the proposed development at the time”. [7] Mr Bowden further said in his response that he and Ms Bloemendal talked about subdivision and he “did my basic investigation and reported to Jessica [Bloemendal] that the available land was less than the 400m2 minimum required mentioned on Table E38.3.2.1” for a “v...

4. OIA-119222.pdf [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...$1000' are separate offence codes. There are additional offence codes for other categorisations of estimated values of goods shoplifted. S9(2)(a) S9(2)(a) f,;, ~ ;')I MINISTRY OF '~i' JUSTICE \,,,~'.\? Tahu o te lure In response to your request please find attached Tables 1-4: • Table 1 provides the number of people with finalised charges for shoplifting (estimated value under $500), by Justice Service Area and year, from 1 July 2019 to 30 June 20...

5. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Name Suppressed [2018] NZLCDT 9 [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...information to his or her professional body. [2] In April 2016 a complaint was made about the practitioner by a close family member. When notified, the practitioner was hurt and furious, and did not believe it was a bona fide complaint. [3] Her response was to tell the NZLS,1 politely, that it was none of their business because she had acted in the transactions concerned, as a family member, not a lawyer. [4] In July 2016 the Standards Committee informed the practitioner that it...

6. New Zealand Law Society v Faleauto [2009] NZLCDT 19 [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...served with the re-laid charges. This Tribunal, in a minute of 16 September 2009, asked Mr Faleauto to advise if he opposed the application for amendment in respect of the P charges. No such objection was received by the 4 Tribunal, and in his response to all the proceedings, filed on 16 November 2009, Mr Faleauto makes no comment at all on the re-laying of the charges. [13] This Tribunal has to satisfy itself, after reviewing the transitional provisions of the LC Act, that no...

7. Taueki - Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Māori Reservation (2005) 163 Aotea MB 99 (163 AOT 99) [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...amount paid each year. The hearing then set down for 17 September 2003 was the first occasion when these matters were traversed in detail. Hearing: 17 September 2005 [6] According the Court's records at the time of hearing there were some 17 responsible trustees, Ada Tatana, Hohepa Kerehi, James Broughton, Peter Ranginui, Rangipo Metekingi, Derek Timu, Brian Rose, Bryce Paki, Nathan Nahona, William Taueki, Te Aurere Hurinui, Miller Waho, Charles Rudd, Neil Taueki, Jim Cunning...

8. LCRO 024/2018 NN v AE (23 April 2019) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...[Ms NN] in those terms then Ms NN would make a complaint about Mrs SL’s conduct to the Real Estate Agents Authority (REAA). Complaint [15] Mr AE lodged a complaint with the Lawyers Complaints Service on 4 April 2017. He said he held Ms NN responsible for not having cancelled the first agreement as instructed which had prevented him and Mrs SL from selling the property to the second purchasers. He sought an apology and compensation. (1) Instruction to avoid first agreement [...

9. Body Corporate 81738 v Wellington City Council [2010] NZWHT Wellington 15 [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...elected not to participate in these proceedings.Mr Hazelhurst in his brief of evidence refers to the faulty workmanship of the junction between the fascia in the EPIS wall cladding (pp33). The Joyce Group Report identified the plasterer as being responsible for damage to timber framing below the parapet at Unit 13 and a number of areas for which the plasterer was at fault. Leaks did result. Did Bonavista Direct, Manage and Control the Fixing of the EIFS Frame and Windows on...

10. LCRO 7/2018 AB v CD (26 November 2019) [pdf, 165 KB]

    ...receiving from Mr AB, prompting it to give consideration to commencing an own motion inquiry. [27] At the hearing, Mr AB confirmed that an own motion enquiry had been initiated. That inquiry focused on concerns as to how Mr AB had managed his responses to the complaint, and concerns that he had, in the course of providing those responses, been discourteous to Mr CD. [28] Following completion of its inquiry, the Committee entered an unsatisfactory conduct finding. Mr AB advised...