Search Results

Search results for response.

15666 items matching your search terms

  1. [2024] NZLVT 063 - Bottinga v Auckland Council (16 December 2024) [pdf, 357 KB]

    ...value: $814,975 Value of Improvements: $100,000 Capital Value $914,975 The Tribunal notes the slight difference in the calculation of the unuseable land area at $94,975 rather than the correct calculation to $95,106. Mr Kanji response to Ms Bottinga’s evidence Mr Kanji stated that he was not clear why Mrs Bottinga considers the properties listed in her document titled “COMPARISON PRICING” are comparable to the subject property, and her calculations do not al...

  2. Rogers v Wiringi - Succession to Ngahuiatapu Rogers [2024] Chief Judge's MB 1844 (2024 CJ 1844) [pdf, 272 KB]

    ...https://www.maorilandcourt.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Decisions/milner-v-milner-estate-of-warihi-te-keu-faenza-milner200883-ruatoria-mb-108.pdf 2024 Chief Judge's MB 1855 [25] In this case there was a close blood relationship, Graham was with the deceased and Hargrave most of his childhood and they assumed responsibility for him until and after he left boarding school. There was no ōhākī but the customary values and practices of Ngāti Te Roro o Te Rangi recognise that whān...

  3. [2024] NZEnvC 269 CSI Property Limited v Selwyn District Council [pdf, 12 MB]

    ...speed environment and the urbanising of the area. In addition, other transport network upgrades are also required in order to accommodate growth and traffic from the ODP area. The nature of these works, timing requirements and anticipated funding responsibility is set out in Table 1 below and a consent notice or similar mechanism shall be imposed at the time of any subdivision consent to ensure these outcomes. 17 100443494/1898697.2 78321180v2 DEV-RO7-TABLE1: Transport networ...

  4. Tairua - Succession to Tihema Takena Wihongi [2024] Chief Judge's MB 1669 (2024 CJ 1669) [pdf, 282 KB]

    ...any objections are received, the matter be referred to the Court for directions. Ko te hātepe ture o te tono nei Procedural history [5] The Registrar’s Report was distributed to parties on 6 March 2024 and parties were notified that responses should be filed in writing by 22 March 2024. [6] The applicant relies on statements made by Elaine Heremaia regarding the signing of the will by the deceased. Ms Heremaia aged 65 years was raised by her grandmother, Tihema Takena Ta...

  5. U Ltd v M Ltd [2025] NZDT 63 (13 February 2025) [pdf, 250 KB]

    ...cancelled, nor was he aware that the Agreement would continue as a general agency after 20 April 2024. Rather, he believed that he had taken the Property off the market and the Agreement was therefore at an end. Mr M also notes that the Applicant’s responsibility under the Agreement was to market the Property, and, by its conduct, the Applicant accepted that the Agreement was at an end because UH did not continue to market the Property. 18. At the second hearing, the parties did not...

  6. Auckland Standards Committee v Davidson [2012] NZLCDT 35 [pdf, 119 KB]

    ...with the regulatory authorities, the trustee and the external auditors. Before the prospectus or investment statement was submitted to the Board for approval, representation letters were obtained from each of the Managers of the Executive Team responsible for the 7 particular area of work confirming that there was nothing in the statements which was untrue or misleading. Mr Davidson has described how he had sought to ensure all Board material was circulated well in advanc...

  7. [2025] NZEmpC 198 Rural Practice Ltd and Abdul Jabbar v A Labour Inspector [pdf, 234 KB]

    ...are able to agree on costs. If that is not possible, the Labour Inspector may apply for an order by way of a memorandum filed and served within 28 days of this judgment. The plaintiffs then must file and serve their memorandum setting out their response to the application within a further 21 days. 48 A Labour Inspector v Chhoir [2020] NZEmpC 203, [2020] ERNZ 479. 49 A Labour Inspector v Jeet Holdings Ltd [2021] NZEmpC 84. 50 A Labour Inspector v Samra Holdings Ltd [2022] NZEmp...

  8. Turangawaewae Trust Board v Takerei - Section 166 Suburb of Newcastle North (2013) 67 Waikato-Maniapoto 113 (67 WMN 113) [pdf, 213 KB]

    ...Pa Regulations, 1940 but were never gazetted.29 [54] On 16 November 1981, Mr Maniapoto sought internal advice as to the status of the Ngaruawahia Pa Regulations, 1940 and the process by which a change to the regulations could be achieved. A response from the office solicitor is on file dated 25 November 1981.30 26 46 Waikato MB 55 (46 W 55). 27 51 Waikato MB 54 (51 W 54). 28 Correspondence from I D Bell, Deputy Registrar to Mr P H...

  9. Muraahi v Phillips Rangitoto Tuhua 55B1B and 55B1A2 Manu Ariki Marae [2013] Māori Appellate Court 561 (2013 APPEAL 561) [pdf, 284 KB]

    ...... Security of title by registration lies at the very heart of this country's system of land ownership. The legislature must be taken to have been well aware of that, as is noted by McGechan J at p 673 of the Housing Corporation case. Those responsible for drafting the Act must be taken to have known of the Judge's comments in that case and have been aware of the need, if the intention was to override the LTA, to say so expressly. Had Parliament intended to impinge upon indefea...

  10. [2017] NZEmpC 68 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 272 KB]

    ...Q. You may not be aware of the situation. A. Well I am aware of a gentleman by the name of Tan who is also on the transfer list. Yes. And I am aware that we are not employing him at the moment. Q. Is Ms Park the manager who[’s] responsible for handling that dispute. A. Well yes and as well as me so that makes me responsible too. Q. Well are you aware then that one of the reasons why you have denied an obligation to employ Mr Tan is because he was a...