Search Results

1. ORC - Joint Supplementary Statement of Evidence - Felicity Boyd & Kerstin Strauss - 8 November 2021 [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...minute dated 4 November 2021. 6 Some of the questions are in relation to PC8 as a whole, while others are applicable to both discharges of effluent and to discharges of nitrogen, or only to discharges of effluent. This statement sets out the responses of Ms Felicity Boyd and Ms Kerstin Strauss to the questions posed by the Court. The witness that has given the answer to each question is indicated in italics following the question. The questions in the Court’s minute have been ad...

2. Kruger v Nikora - Tuhoe -Te Uru Taumatua [2021] Māori Appellate Court MB 444 (2021 APPEAL 444) [pdf, 296 KB]

   ...interpretative question before this Court because they merely reflect the current state of the law at the time the amendment Act was passed. Instead, TUT says the exclusion of “General land owned by Māori” from the scope of injunctive relief in response to Moke illustrates a degree of discomfort at the Māori Land Court’s jurisdiction over post-settlement governance entities. This supports the conclusion that including TUT under s 236(1)(c) is not only inconsistent with the le...

3. 8.2 Appendix 2 to JWS 8 - Recommended Amendments to PC7 [pdf, 426 KB]

   ...Community water supply Means a water supply for the primary purpose of supplying drinking water to communities, that may also be used for industrial and business uses, and is for the purpose of enabling territorial authorities to meet their responsibilities for the supply of drinking water under the Health Act 1956 and the Local Government Act 2002. A community water supply serves 25 or more people for at least 60 days a year. Right of Priority Means a right all...

4. 8.2 Appendix 2 to JWS 8 - Recommended Amendments to PC7 [pdf, 426 KB]

   ...Community water supply Means a water supply for the primary purpose of supplying drinking water to communities, that may also be used for industrial and business uses, and is for the purpose of enabling territorial authorities to meet their responsibilities for the supply of drinking water under the Health Act 1956 and the Local Government Act 2002. A community water supply serves 25 or more people for at least 60 days a year. Right of Priority Means a right all...

5. 8.2 Appendix 2 to JWS 8 - Recommended Amendments to PC7 [pdf, 401 KB]

   ...Community water supply Means a water supply for the primary purpose of supplying drinking water to communities, that may also be used for industrial and business uses, and is for the purpose of enabling territorial authorities to meet their responsibilities for the supply of drinking water under the Health Act 1956 and the Local Government Act 2002. A community water supply serves 25 or more people for at least 60 days a year. Right of Priority Means a right all...

6. SN v D Ltd [2022] NZDT 168 (4 October 2022) [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...himself with the condition and accept the vehicle on an ‘as-is, where- is’ basis with no warranties whatsoever. (5) The seller warrants that the seller is the legal owner and has the right to sell the vehicle. (6) the buyer shall undertake full responsibilities upon receiving the vehicle, and damages caused after the handling over date shall be on the buyer’s’ liabilities. 31. In D Ltd’s written submissions it wrote that Mr SN should have detected the signs of misfiring during...

7. [2022] NZEnvC 233 Wellington Regional Council v Crosbie [pdf, 489 KB]

   ...Horo Beach Road, Te Horo 5581; and (c) Third respondent, Nikau Lakes Biosystem Limited - 34 Anlaby Road, Nikau Valley, Paraparaumu, 5032. [4] The Council explained it had amended the orders initially sought in its application to place primary responsibility for remediation upon the First and Second Respondents. The Council proposes a further order that authorises and requires the Third Respondent to undertake remediation work on behalf of the First and Second Respondents should...

8. Insley v Insley - Awanui Haparapara No 2B No 1B Sec 2 [2023] Chief Judge's MB 323 (2023 CJ 323) [pdf, 416 KB]

   ...[4] On 31 May 2021, the Report was distributed to all affected parties for whom addresses were known. [5] An objection to the Report was received from counsel for the applicants, John Kahukiwa of Corban Revell, on 4 June 2021. [6] Seven other responses to the Report were also received, all in favour of the recommendations made, from Bronwyn Ngatai, Burton Insley, Daniel Payne, Danielle Insley, Gayle Ngatai, Kitana Delamere, Michael Insley and Michaela Insley. [7] The application w...

9. Harris v Accident Compensation Corporation (Entitlement to Surgery) [2022] NZACC 231 [pdf, 310 KB]

   ...following a specific injury event, I have forwarded my assessment report to ACC for consideration of approval for the proposed surgical treatment. [14] Mr Chandru submitted an Assessment Report and Treatment Plan to ACC on 28 February 2019. [15] In response, ACC wrote to Mr Harris on 4 March 2019 noting: Before we can make a decision we need to make sure the surgery is treating an injury caused by the accident of 28/12/2018, and not a pre-existing or unrelated health condition....

10. [2023] NZEnvC 057 Brial v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 279 KB]

    ...Leith that the majority of effects associated with earthworks would be temporary.47 [54] Ms Robb and Ms Walker respond that the proposed consent conditions are appropriate and sufficient, including in the sense of being fairly informed of and responsive to the Brials’ concerns. The conditions include: (a) a specified curtilage area confining where domestic landscaping and structures may be located; (b) a maximum building coverage of 450 m2; (c) a maximum building height of 6m...