Search Results

1. Justice Sector Criminal justice forecast 2010 to 2020 [pdf, 798 KB]

   ...violence and given a sentence of greater than five years. This could be considered as the judicial reaction to a sentinel event; Proportion served increases by 10 percentage points for the same group. This could be considered the Parole Board‟s response to a sentinel event. These two changes would not occur together. The Parole Board change would start affecting people sentenced before the sentinel event as they come up for parole after the event. The impact of the longer sent...

2. [2010] NZEmpC 120 Musa v Whanganui DHB & Anor [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...comments attributed to you are correct, then it would appear that you have put the Board at risk of suit by the CEO for breach of the agreement and you may even have exposed yourself to personal liability. … Could you also let me have your prompt response, it is important for me to take steps as soon as possible to minimize the risk to the Board arising from this incident. [75] Neither piece of correspondence either establishes a breach of the settlement agreement by the Board or ev...

3. [2009] NZEmpC AC 16A/09 Peterson & Anor v B Engineering Ltd & Anor [pdf, 87 KB]

   PETERSON & ANOR V P & B ENGINEERING LTD & ANOR AK AC 16A/09 9 December 2009 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 16A/09 ARC 73/08 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CARL JAMES PETERSON First Plaintiff AND KARL JACOB PETERSON Second Plaintiff AND P AND B ENGINEERING LTD First Defendant AND PETERSON GLOBAL SALES LTD Second Defendant Hearing: 22-26 June 2009 (Heard at Rotorua) 30

4. [2015] NZEmpC 112 Vince Roberts Electrical v Carroll [pdf, 202 KB]

   VINCE ROBERTS ELECTRICAL LIMITED v SCOTT PHILLIP CARROLL NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 112 [14 July 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 112 ARC 89/12 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN VINCE ROBERTS ELECTRICAL LIMITED Plaintiff AND SCOTT PHILLIP CARROLL First Defendant AND VINCENT FORSMAN ROBERTS (TRADING AS VINCE ROBERTS ELECTRICAL) Second Defe

5. Top Energy Ltd - Whakataha Z1C (2015) 104 Taitokerau MB 108 (104 TTK 108) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...hearing in the local newspapers to encourage further owner participation. [15] I also noted during the teleconference that on 27 June 2013 the Court had received documentation filed by Leslie Te Kooti of the “Leslie Te Kooti Whānau Trust” in response to the applications. Mr Te Kooti, who is shown in the Court records as Leslie Court and holding 0.41 shares in Whakataha Z1C and 4.166 shares in Tapapanui B4D2 in his own name, did not clearly express support or opposition to the...

6. Sanders v King - Part Parish of Whangape Lot 15B Block and Parish of Whangape Lot 15C (Urupa) (2014) 81 Waikato Maniapoto MB 109 (81 WMN 109) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...19 Black’s Law Dictionary supra fn 18 at p 1243. 81 Waikato Maniapoto MB 123 The purpose and scheme of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 [51] The Act represented a major shift in thinking from earlier Māori land legislation. In response to large scale loss of Māori freehold land the Act emphasises the retention of Māori land. As the Preamble says land is: a taonga tuku iho of special significance to Maori people and, for that reason, to promote the retention of th...

7. [2014] NZEmpC 74 NZ Aluminimum Smelters Ltd v Weller Ors [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...trial to proceed. 3 None of the many witnesses was able to say with confidence when this trial began but it was probably mid-1992. [16] There was no clear evidence about how employees’ response to the proposal was collected but several witnesses said that about 90 percent of shift workers were in favour of the trial. The plant wide trial began in May 1993. [17] That wider trial showed that Roster 2 was generally acceptable...

8. [2014] NZEmpC 68 Howell v Zeetags [pdf, 143 KB]

   TODD HOWELL v MSG INVESTMENTS LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ZEE TAGS LIMITED) NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 68 [12 May 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND REGISTRY [2014] NZEmpC 68 ARC 58/13 UNDER IN THE MATTER OF the Holidays Act 2003 and the Employment Relations Act 2000 proceedings removed AND IN THE MATTER of an action for recovery of wages BETWEEN TODD HOWELL Plaintiff AND MSG INVESTMENTS LIMITED (FORMERLY KN

9. [2014] NZEmpC 100 George v Auckland Council ARC 12410 Auckland Council v George costs [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...employees of the Council, which it was entitled to treat seriously. This was reinforced by the range and quantum of remedies sought on Ms George’s behalf. Having said that, this was not the sort of case that reasonably required a gold plated response. And ultimately it was decided on the facts. [50] Standing back and having regard to the particular features of this proceeding, what was reasonably required to respond to it, excluding the interlocutory steps identified above...

10. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee No 2 v X [2010] NZLCDT 14 [pdf, 115 KB]

    ...[27] We would have expected these questions to have been resolved by the Standards Committee, as part of its investigation responding to the complaints made. For the reasons we note, these matters remain at large, and as part of Mr XXXX’s response to the charge laid against him he has raised these jurisdictional issues. Submissions relating to jurisdiction were made at the commencement of the hearing. In respect of those submissions the Tribunal reserved its position, and elect...