Search Results

1. 2012 Ministry of Justice annual report [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...Chief Executive’s report 2 The Ministry of Justice 4 The justice sector 5 What we did and the impact we had 7 Supporting our outcomes in a changing operating environment 8 Making communities safer 9 Maintaining the integrity and improving the responsiveness of the justice system 11 Maintaining the civil and democratic rights of New Zealanders 14 Measuring the Ministry’s efficiency and cost-effectiveness 17 Assessing our organisational health and capability 18 Financial statements...

2. Waitangi Tribunal Report on the Aotearoa Institute claim concerning Te Wānanga o Aotearoa [pdf, 748 KB]

   ...with the Crown in 2001 is testimony to this . But such growth has brought its own problems  for TWOA in its go�ernance, management, and quality assurance . Since 2003, the Crown has  rightly exercised its responsibility to ensure that the public funds granted to the wānanga  ha�e been properly spent on producing quality educational outcomes . The question before  the Wai 12...

3. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v Telecom NZ 2688 [2013] NZCOP 13 [pdf, 329 KB]

   ...dated. It also explained the consequences to the account holder of further infringing, and how the account holder might challenge the notice. It was numbered, under Telecom’s numbering system, as “infringement notice number: 369”. There was no response by the Respondent; in particular, there was no challenge to the infringement notice. The warning notice [10] On 28 May 2012 RIANZ procured the sending of a warning notice under s 122E. It was numbered 2183 by Telecom. As require...

4. Update to Minister on applying the investment approach to Justice [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...Standalone roading budget. 1c: Accountability Clear accountabilities for creating long-term value, and transparency over use of funding. Shareholders hold insurance company accountable for maximising profits, via Board. Crown entity responsible for minimising long-term costs, via independent Board. Work and Income responsible for employment Assistance funding, via advisory Board.3 Crown entity responsible for pharmaceutical budget, via independent Board. Crown...

5. RM v LN LCRO 106 / 2011 (2 October 2012) [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...my case was progressing and the costs involved. In the transcript of the meeting with Colleen Prendergast you will see that she made comment as to how they got upset about my email and how they considered it to be counter productive. There [sic] response to me made me feel as though I had no right to be requesting this information and I still feel to this day that their response was un-necessary and un-professionally abrupt. 8 LN was referring to a letter from RM dated 22 M...

6. Singh v Golian [2017] NZIACDT 14 (12 September 2017) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...Furthermore, the adviser persisted with those actions to a point that leaves no room for the Tribunal to conclude his actions were a lapse falling short of the disciplinary threshold. He persisted with his errors of judgement, notwithstanding responses from the IPT and INZ that ought to have caused him to pause and reflect and identify why his actions were ill-advised. The complaint [8] While the professional judgements exercised by the adviser are very much in dispute, the esse...

7. Churton v Trustees of Mangaporou Trust - Kauaeroa (2002) 122 Aotea MB 182 (122 AOT 182) [pdf, 542 KB]

   ...would be 30 beneficial owners present in person at the meeting (vi) That if any trustee fails to attend 3 consecutive meetings without reasonable excuse he/she would be removed (b) That the advisory trustees be removed and that the existing responsible trustees stand down which was agreed to by them. Following an election the following persons were elected as responsible trustees. (i) Piripi Haami (ii) Maraea Taiwhati (iii) Ron Hough (iv) Michael Parker (v) Mereania Kara...

8. LCRO 54/2018 KJ v VW (6 July 2018) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...agents; and 4 (ii) it “would not have matched” the sum Mr VW paid to his vendor clients. (b) Mr VW “ought to have made an inquiry” about that discrepancy at the time”. He says the “documents were not cross checked”. Response [16] In his response, Mr VW states that he had met his professional obligations in acting for the vendors on the sale of the property. He says it was “Mr KJ’s and [Ms CD’s] responsibility to examine the settlement statement...

9. Sharing information safely: Summary of feedback [pdf, 370 KB]

   ...Information sharing generally The sector expressed views on information sharing generally and on the scheme introduced by the Family Violence Act across all feedback methods. It was agreed that information sharing is critical to develop integrated responses to clients, and is great if used correctly and in a safe way. Submitters noted that communication and system barriers can prevent sharing from happening, but recognised that information sharing can promote collaborative responses...

10. Williams v Cotter-Arlidge - Okaihau 3C2 (2019) 77 Tākitimu MB 51 (77 TKT 51) [pdf, 416 KB]

    ...paying any further money to Mr Williams. Applicant’s submissions [7] Mr Williams filed written submissions on 1 April 2019 in addition to his appearance. Mr Williams submits he was engaged on 15 March 2012 by Arama Puriri, who was the sole responsible trustee at the time and remained in that role until the respondents were appointed in May 2014. He was known to Mr Puriri as he had previously rendered accounting services 1...