15692 items matching your search terms
...And Taylor Roofing (Auckland) 1992 Limited Third respondent Determination of Adjudicator 27 February 2004 Index Chapter Heading Page 1. Summary 2 2. Adjudication Process 4 3. The Property 6 4. The Claimants' Position 8 5. Response Auckland City Council 10 6. Response William Holden 11 7. Response Taylor Roofing 14 8. Leaking Causes 16 8.1 Landscaping 16 8.2 Mock Chimney Wall 16 8.3 Windowsill Flashings 18 8.4 Plaster System 19 8.5 Claims of Delay and Want o...
...many of the facts concerning the death as the public interest requires, without deducing from those facts any determination of blame... In many cases, perhaps the majority, the facts themselves will demonstrate quite clearly whether anyone bears any responsibility for the death; there is a difference between a form of proceeding which affords to others the opportunity to judge an issue and one which appears to judge the issue itself.” 71. Domestic courts have made, inter alia, the fol...
...April 2004). Therefore, neither TPGL nor SI No 5 is a party to this adjudication. 3.5 The third respondent is Mr Stephen Lay, whom the Owners say was the builder who organised and supervised the construction work. Mr Lay’s actual role and responsibilities in the Ponsonby Gardens development will need to be determined by me, but there is no argument about the fact that Mr Lay was involved with the construction work on this project. The Owners claim that Mr Lay failed to man...
...April 2004). Therefore, neither TPGL nor SI No 5 is a party to this adjudication. 3.5 The third respondent is Mr Stephen Lay, whom the Owners say was the builder who organised and supervised the construction work. Mr Lay’s actual role and responsibilities in the Ponsonby Gardens development will need to be determined by me, but there is no argument about the fact that Mr Lay was involved with the construction work on this project. The Owners claim that Mr Lay failed to man...
...for failing to pay security for costs, with no order as to costs. This would enable them to finalise the liquidation and retire as liquidators. [6] On 17 September 2019 I gave the first plaintiff and the defendant 14 days to file and serve any response to the liquidators’ memorandum. No response has been received. [7] In these circumstances, it is appropriate to dismiss the challenge in its entirety. No order for costs is made as between the second plaintiff and the defendan...
...management policy” On 2 March 2023, the Ministry contacted you to clarify your request. Under s15(1AA) of the Act, any clarification or amendment of a request is considered a new request for the purpose of calculating the statutory timeframe for response. On 2 March 2023, you confirmed that your request could be clarified to the following: “…the debt management policy that deals with where the Ministry of Justice is owed money. For example, MOJ has raised an invoice in their...
...the Criminal Procedure Act 2011 (CPA), which governs private prosecutions, came into force on July 2013. The Criminal Procedure Act Commencement Order 2013 is available at: legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/2013/0162/9.0/whole.html In response to your request please see Tables 1 to 4, enclosed. Please note that this information provides for the District Court only. This is because charging documents are filed in the District Court. If you require any further information,...
...those listed in 1 above by region. There are 5,144 employees on the Ministry’s payroll system. A breakdown of the Ministry’s job positions and by region, as at 16 April 2025 is attached to this letter in Appendix 1. Please note that this response, with your personal details removed, may be published on the Ministry’s website at: Official Information Act responses | New Zealand Ministry of Justice If you are not satisfied with this response, you have the right to make a compla...
...Adoption Law reform Thank you for your email of 28 November 2024 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding the Adoption Law reform. Specifically, you requested: Please provide a demographic breakdown of responses to the two adoption law reform discussion documents. First discussion document submissions On 18 June 2021, the Government asked the public about their views on our adoption laws. A discussion document was released covering six k...
...have interpreted part 1 of your request to be for the number of referrals made to Kathy Orr for section 178 reports under the Oranga Tamariki Act 1989, for the last eight calendar years. Please refer to Table 1, attached, for this information. In response to part 2 of your request, the Ministry does not hold the information requested. This information may be held by the court which is excluded from the Act under section 2(6)(a). Therefore, this part of your request is refused under se...