Search Results

Search results for response.

15692 items matching your search terms

  1. 2025 NZPSPLA 078.pdf [pdf, 123 KB]

    ...records in place. [2] Mr Anisi accepts Protektus engaged two security guards knowing they did not hold current certificates of approval (COA). He also accepts they do not have adequate onboarding processes, record keeping or knowledge of their responsibilities as a security licence holder. Mr Anisi however says he and his wife have learnt their lessons and they will in future comply with their legal responsibilities. He asks that they be able to keep their security licence so they can...

  2. NZ government response to Law Commission report [pdf, 78 KB]

    Government Response to Law Commission Report on Review of the Law of Trusts: A Trusts Act for New Zealand Presented to the House of Representatives 2 Government Response to Law Commission Report on Review of the Law of Trusts: A Trusts Act for New Zealand Introduction The Government has considered the Law Commission’s Report, Review of the Law of Trusts: A Trusts Act for New Zealan...

  3. BORA Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Bill [pdf, 147 KB]

    LEGAL ADVICE LPA 01 01 24 23 April 2019 Hon David Parker, Attorney-General Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Bill Purpose 1. We have considered whether the Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Bill (‘the Bill’) is consistent with the rights and freedoms affirmed in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (‘the Bill of Rights Act’). 2. We have not yet received a final version of the Bill....

  4. LF Ltd v DQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 186 (8 November 2022) [pdf, 105 KB]

    ...for non-liability in tort, only in contract. However, the matter was adjourned and the respondent filed a counterclaim for $2,499.42, so the Tribunal is now able to determine the dispute. 3. The issues to be determined are: a) Was the applicant responsible for the damage? Did the respondent contribute to the damage? b) What sum, if any, is payable? Was the applicant responsible for the damage? Did the respondent contribute to the damage? 4. The tort of negligence applies when some...

  5. N Ltd v O Ltd [2022] NZDT 245 (25 November 2022) [pdf, 137 KB]

    ...for the losses from paua deaths. Did N Ltd breach its contract or fail to act regarding the loss experienced by O Ltd? 2. I am satisfied that N Ltd carried out all the work it was required to do as an agent acting for O Ltd. I was not responsible in any way for the delays that led to the death of paua. The actions of N Ltd did not cause O Ltd to have a failure of the delivery of live paua. Did N Ltd fail to disclose information about B Ltd’s terms and conditions to O Lt...

  6. 2024 NZPSPLA 057.pdf [pdf, 116 KB]

    ...made within the timetable provided was an email stating: As it seems to me that the PSPLA and the Police are out of touch with normalcy and reality I have no further submissions to make. [7] However, he has subsequently emailed the following response: I did NO ACTUAL HARM to any person in the matters before you. I did not seek to break any laws. It is a matter that can be addressed by reminding me to stay within the law, as I have done. I put it to you that it would be counter...

  7. OIA-105436.pdf [pdf, 336 KB]

    ...offence) Crimes Act 1908 but only for offences committed with any other male human being section 154 (attempt to commit unnatural offence) Crimes Act 1908 but only for offences attempted to be committed with or against any other male human being In response to this part of your request, please refer to the attached table. This table provides statistical information about the numbers of people convicted of relevant offences. For convenience the numbers are grouped by decade, from the 19...

  8. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 v Silvester [2023] NZLCDT 47 (31 October 2023) [pdf, 86 KB]

    ...DECISION 31 October 2023 COUNSEL Mr E McCaughan for the Standards Committee (by VMR) No appearance by or for the Respondent Practitioner 2 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON LIABILITY AND PENALTY [1] Ms Silvester made a detailed response to the Standards Committee investigation1, admitting that she had altered documents and misled her supervising partner. She disputed that her conduct amounted to misconduct. She apologised for her actions, and expressed her re...

  9. OIA-123458.pdf [pdf, 763 KB]

    ...Act), regarding security screening. For ease of reference, I have separated your request and responded to each part. 1. In respect of my question replicated in the attached letter as paragraph identified by the number 1 and the Ministry’s response, is that the extent of the considerations taken into account or were there other considerations: 2. If there were other considerations, what were they; Yes, that is the extent of the considerations taken into account. To reite...

  10. Auckland Standards Committee v Matheson [2015] NZLCDT 4 [pdf, 74 KB]

    ...for the Tribunal. Despite that, Mr Matheson agrees with the submission put forward on behalf of the Standards Committee, that a conviction of this kind in all likelihood will lead to a period of suspension as a proper professional disciplinary response. [7] Counsel and Mr Matheson had agreed that the range of such suspension would be some three to six months, but we note that the Tribunal is not bound by penalty discussions between the parties and we will say more of that later....