LCRO 35/2021 ZN v YM and XL (16 December 2021) [pdf, 237 KB]
...that Mr XL (the partner who had initially responded to the complaint that Ms ZN had forwarded directly to [VHG] would be included, along with Ms YM, as a party to the complaint. [11] Mr XL responded to Ms ZN’s complaint on 26 November 2020. His response was provided on behalf of himself and Ms YM. He submitted that: (a) there was no proper or reasonable basis for the complaints and criticisms that Ms ZN had made; and (b) Ms YM had expressed an interest in becoming a member of...