Search Results

1. Hall v Opepe Farm Trust (2010) 19 Waiariki MB 258 (19 WAR 258) [pdf, 442 KB]

   ...inquiring as to the reasons for the delay in responding given that “...the situation is one that has serious personal consequences for each of the trustees.” Mr Hall wrote that unless a meeting was arranged before 13 March or a satisfactory response was received then proceedings would be filed. Mr Maniapoto replied on 13 March 2009 repeating earlier advice that a trustees’ hui was set for 30 March 2009. Following that on 30 March 2009 Mr Maniapoto advised Mr Hall that a meeti...

2. Report-of-Helen-Anderson-s.198D-Planning-Report-HDC-KCDC-O2NL-Notice-of-Requirement-FINAL-28-April-2023.pdf [pdf, 13 MB]

   ...Authority: Section 198D Report – Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project (Ō2NL Project) Prepared by Helen Anderson – Planning 13 a) The NoR and Assessment of Environmental Effects (“AEE”) dated 1 November 20221: b) Response to request for further information under section 92 of the RMA, received by HDC and KCDC on 17th January 2023. c) Letter received from the Requiring Authority dated 21 March 2023 updating a number of conditions in response to discussi...

3. Report-of-Helen-Anderson-s.198D-Planning-Report-HDC-KCDC-O2NL-Notice-of-Requirement.pdf [pdf, 13 MB]

   ...Authority: Section 198D Report – Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project (Ō2NL Project) Prepared by Helen Anderson – Planning 13 a) The NoR and Assessment of Environmental Effects (“AEE”) dated 1 November 20221: b) Response to request for further information under section 92 of the RMA, received by HDC and KCDC on 17th January 2023. c) Letter received from the Requiring Authority dated 21 March 2023 updating a number of conditions in response to discussi...

4. CN v EE LCRO 122 / 2011 (22 October 2013) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...administration duties, in particular her failure to have acted on instructions from Mrs CN as to the scope of enquiry to be made into the assets. [3] Mrs EE is a legal executive in the firm of [Law Firm], and was responsible for the estate file. A response to the complaint was forwarded on her behalf by Mr ED, a principal of the firm who initially perceived the complaints to have been made 2 “generically against the firm”,1 although later accepted that this was a complai...

5. Godinich v Guan Thye Heng Co Ltd [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...assessing a claim for contribution is provided in s.17 (2) of the Law Reform Act 1936. It says in essence that the amount of contribution recoverable shall be such as may be found by the Court to be just and equitable having regard to the relevant responsibilities of the parties for the damage. What is a ‘just and equitable’ distribution of responsibility is a question of fact, and although guidance can be obtained from previous decisions of the Courts, ultimately each case wi...

6. JK v SY LCRO 271/2013 (9 September 2016) [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...(g) A retired High Court Judge should be appointed to investigate the complaint. [28] Mr [SY] responded to the complaint through his counsel, [L3] QC, in correspondence beginning with Mr [L3’s] letter dated 9 November 2012. Mr [SY’s] response may be summarised as follows: (a) The March 2009 statement of claim alleged that Mr [JK] completed an account operating authority and that, by so doing, he had represented that he was authorised by [CO 2] and by [CO 1] to open and opera...

7. LCRO 220/2020 UOY - Application for review of a prosecutorial decision (3 June 2021) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...proceedings.3 [16] As well, Ms SV attached an undated copy of a review carried out by a Chartered Accountant of the OY Trust, and in particular bank transactions over a one- month period between 30 October and 30 November 2018 (the OP review). Response [17] Through his counsel Mr LX, Mr UOY responded to the complaint in a letter to the Complaints Service dated 13 December 2019. He submitted that: (a) The notes of evidence contain “a significant number of errors”. (b) Ms SV a...

8. [2007] NZEmpC WC 22/07 Tawhiwhirangi v CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...1 The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections v Tawhiwhirangi, unreported, Judge Shaw, 13 September 2007, WC 14A/07 including the possibility that the regional manager for the Department’s Prisons Service responsible for Rimutaka Prison (Mrs Field) initiate disciplinary proceedings against Mr Tawhiwhirangi. [8] By letter dated 8 August 2007 (but not sent until 10 August) and addressed to Mr Tawhiwhirangi at Rimutaka Prison, Mrs Field, the actin

9. [2011] NZEmpC 160 Angus & McKean v Ports of Auckland Ltd [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...us by Mr Mitchell, it is neither ineffectual nor even insignificant. The Authority and the Court must continue to make an assessment of the conduct of a fair and reasonable employer in the circumstances of the parties and judge the employer‟s response to the situation that gave rise to the grievance against that standard. What new s 103A (“could”) contemplates is that the Authority or the Court is no longer to determine justification (what the employer did and how the empl...

10. E87 Fiona Knox – Corporate – RE – Applicant [pdf, 1.1 MB]

    ...274 parties and the body corporates of the apartments in the Viaduct Harbour and Wynyard Precincts. Reminders were sent on 9 August 2018. 4.3 On the meeting on Tuesday 14 August, the following was presented: a) An overview of the function and responsibilities of the Group; b) The current timelines; c) The Project, the construction programme and the management plan framework; d) Pre-hearing consultation process with submitters and section 274 parties, and how feedback receive...