Search Results

1. INZ (Calder) v Ahmed [2019] NZIACDT 18 (2 April 2019) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...[41] Mr Ahmed sent a statement of reply (dated 19 March 2017), with supporting documents. It will be considered later in the assessment section. Mr Ahmed does not request an oral hearing. [42] The complainant has provided an “Assessment of Response”, which is undated but was received by the Tribunal on 4 April 2017. It is a response to Mr Ahmed’s statement of reply. ASSESSMENT [43] The Registrar relies on the following provisions in the Code: General 1. A licensed im...

2. Martelli v The Real Estate Agents Authority CAC (409) NZREADT 23 [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...of an unintentional administrative error can be determined in accordance with prior decisions of this Tribunal, where they had determined that not every departure from best practice will amount to unsatisfactory conduct requiring a disciplinary response [see Wetzell v REAA [2011] READT 8]. [26] The case which the appellant puts forward is therefore that while a breach of rule 9.6 occurred, such breach ought to be considered as not amounting to unsatisfactory conduct. [27] The re...

3. Evidence - Traffic - Minister for Children - Samantha McCarthy - Final [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...(“TA”) for the NOR, which was submitted to Auckland Council on 22 February 2019. Stantec also provided a letter, dated 14 March 2019, responding to transport matters in a Section 92 request for further information from Auckland Council (“s92 response”) on this NOR and one for another site called Korowai Manaaki, which is an existing Youth Justice (“YJ”) facility in Wiri. - 6 - AD-114408-1-3124-V1 5.2. My role has been to lead, manage and review the inputs provi...

4. Ref: LCRO 99/2019 SQ v LP (27 October 2020) [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...illegality” by the Council “there did not appear to be strong arguments for judicial review at [that] stage”. Moreover, Mr ET advised that “a successful judicial review might not achieve much” for Mr SQ because the Council would “still be responsible for applying section 6(c), as [the Council] (reasonably) sees fit”. [73] As noted earlier, from 26 January 2016 Mr ET assisted with Mr SQ’s request to the Council for information about the SNA process, and (b) on 22 Augus...

5. Proactive release - Strengthening the Family Court [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   ...their care. They emphasise children’s rights and child-focused proceedings, which would set the tone for the long-term programme of change I propose will follow these amendments. These changes also emphasise the need for the family justice system to be responsive to the needs of those that are using it. Establishment of a children’s participation principle 38. I propose amending CoCA and the Family Dispute Resolution Act to include children’s participation as a guiding principle, model...

6. [2020] NZIACDT 21 - Immigration New Zealand (Carley) v Penty (18 May 2020) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...standard arrangement sees IPS/BNAC source both the worker (client) and the job in New Zealand. Mr Cleland and now Ms Penty claim IPS/BNAC merely operates a recruiting or employment service since, so it is said, Novo’s licensed adviser takes responsibility for providing the immigration service once the job has been secured. None of the staff of IPS/BNAC are licensed immigration advisers. [9] Mr Cleland was disciplined in respect of 12 Filipino clients. All the immigration applic...

7. LCRO 181/2017 FW and KP v BG (31 October 2019) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...over to Mr FW and Ms KP all contract documents at the same time Mr FW and Ms KP paid the agreed settlement amount to the contractor. (d) Mr BG was unprofessional and discourteous to Ms KP when responding to an email Ms KP had sent to Ms AZ in response to Ms AZ’s explanation of how that settlement would be effected. (e) Mr HM agreed, on behalf of the firm, that the firm would not charge fees to Mr FW and Ms KP after the firm’s “last invoice”, yet sent them a further invoi...

8. [2022] NZEmpC 76 NZQA v Hickey [pdf, 329 KB]

   ...24 December 2021 because it was for a fixed term. Mr Hickey did not accept that his employment would end then because he considered himself to be a permanent employee or was, at least, employed until the PACER programme ended. [4] Mr Hickey’s response was to lodge a claim in the Employment Relations Authority. He sought a declaration that he was a permanent NZQA employee and, among other claims, an order for interim reinstatement. [5] On 25 March 2022, the Authority granted inte...

9. OIA-113556.pdf [pdf, 7.8 MB]

   ...Media & Social Media Manager Joe Locke at media@justice.govt.nz Please note that this response, with your personal details removed, may be published on the Ministry website at: justice.govt.nz/about/official-information-act-requests/oia-responses/ If you are not satisfied with this response, you have the right to make a complaint to the Ombudsman under section 28(3) of the Act. The Ombudsman may be contacted by phone on 0800 802 602 or by email to info@ombudsman.parliament...

10. OIA-106912.pdf [pdf, 1.8 MB]

    ...2023 Our ref: OIA 106912 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Hague Convention conferences Thank you for your email of 16 August 2023 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry), with follow up questions to our previous response of 16 August 2023 (our ref: OIA 106228). Specifically, you requested: Issue 1 – Refusal to provide correspondence with judiciary. Regarding your refusal to provide correspondence with members of the judiciary, we disagree...