T v G LCRO 29 / 2009 (21 April 2009) [pdf, 29 KB]
...progressed substantially by Lawyer G. In August Lawyer G stated he would not be pursing the matter on Client T’s behalf. [3] Client T complained to the New Zealand Law Society on 10 September 2008. The Committee considered the complaint, a response by Lawyer G and the further 2 comments on that response made by Client T. On 11 February 2009 the Standards Committee resolved to take no further action in the exercise of its power under s 138(2) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers A...