Search Results

1. GH v CY LCRO 265/2016 [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...everything to N”. The Standards Committee determination [9] The Standards Committee dealt briefly with Mr GH’s complaints and it is simplest to include all but the first and last paragraphs of the discussion by the Committee: In his response, Mr CY has denied inappropriate dealings with Mr GH, or that he was disrespectful of [Mrs GH] after her death. He says that he did give some advice to [N] (his co-executor) as to her ability to exclude people from the property if she wi...

2. LCRO 197/2013 RN v WB (7 August 2017) [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...retainer, and the fees rendered, which totalled $45,032.47 for both barristers, were reasonable in the circumstances and consistent with the estimates Ms DL gave for them both. Ms WB provided a copy of the written advice she and Ms DL had provided in response to Mr RN’s queries, and other documents, correspondence and file notes. Ms WB says Ms RN had not paid $11,726.20 of her fees. Ms RN’s reply [14] Ms RN provided a lengthy and detailed response disagreeing with much of...

3. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Holland [2022] NZLCDT 20 (27 June 2022) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...[2] Strike-off is not necessarily the final stroke in a lawyer’s career. A lawyer who has been struck off may re-apply if the lawyer can show they are once again fit and proper to practise law. [3] Nonetheless, strike-off is the most severe response available to us. It is only available if we are unanimous. We should not, and would prefer not to, strike her off unless it is the least restrictive outcome. The need to impose the least restrictive outcome was explicitly noted in...

4. LH & TH v D Inc [2023] NZDT 608 (31 October 2023) [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...to come on during the wedding ceremony resulting in many of their guests getting wet, and clothing, footwear and equipment being damaged, including the wedding dress and wedding cake. 8. NK, Co-Chair of the D Inc Committee, says that D Inc is responsible only for the hire of the [venue] building, not for the reserve land the building sits on which is the responsibility of the [Council). He refers to clause 1.4 of the contract which states: “The Hirer acknowledges that the ven...

5. [2024] NZEnvC 042 Nelson City Council v Senk [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...NRMP as the structure is located over the 150mm diameter Council wastewater pipe. A resource consent is required to authorise the structure or the structure needs to be removed in order to comply with Rule REr.34. Case management directions and responses [8] On 7 November 2023, the court issued directions regarding service and for filing of notices and affidavits of opposition. [9] On 10 November 2023, the court updated the directions as follows: 8 (1) The applicant is direc...

6. Proceeds of Crime Fund - Funding proposal template form [docx, 99 KB]

   ...Governance What is the implementation plan for this initiative? Describe the approach to delivery, management, staffing, reporting lines, stakeholder engagement, and change management. Outline how the initiative will be rolled out, including key roles, responsibilities, and oversight. Maximum 300 words. What is the governance structure for this initiative? Describe the oversight framework, including key roles and responsibilities. Explain how the initiative will be governed, detailing d...

7. Nga Kupu Maori mo te Kooti Whenua Maori me te Ropu Whakamana i te Tiriti o Waitangi [pdf, 24 MB]

   ...land) pānga interested parties hunga e whai take ana interim recommendation tūtohunga mō tētahi wā interlocutory whakawhirinaki Intestate mate wira kore investigation tirotirohanga Ii Jj Kk Ll joint memoranda manatu tuku tahi joint responses whakautu tuku tahi joint tenancy puritanga ngātahitanga judicial review arotake i tētahi whakataunga whakawā jurisdiction mana ā-ture kaupapa inquiry ruku tātari ā-kaupapa landlocked land whenua tomonga kore lease rīh...

8. Evaluation of the Te Hurihanga pilot [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...assessment of the systems contributing to antisocial behaviour. Progress towards outcomes for youth and family/caregivers is monitored closely. Families/caregivers are full collaborators in treatment planning and delivery. The treatment team are responsible for engaging families in this process. Treatments seek to empower family/caregivers with skills and resources to address the difficulties that arise in raising youth. These are provided through interventions such as family thera...

9. Technical report of evaluation of the court-referred restorative justice pilot [pdf, 681 KB]

   ...Reasons for not interviewing offenders or victims 23 Table 8 Characteristics of all referred, all conferenced, and the comparison offenders: percentages 30 Table 9 Number of returns by key informants’ group to initial questionnaire and response rates 35 Table 10 Number of returns by key informants’ group to follow-up questionnaire and response rates 35 Table 11 Demographic profile of groups used in the reconviction analysis, including significance of difference from...

10. Nakarawa v AFFCO NZ Ltd [2014] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 168 KB]

    ...put to all applicants (“is there any reason why you would not be able to work any of the hours listed above?”), Ms Ogg said that this was couched in general terms to give the applicant an opportunity to raise any issue they wished. It was the responsibility of the applicant to raise any of the prohibited grounds of discrimination. The submissions for Mr Nakarawa [44] For Mr Nakarawa it was submitted: [44.1] Saturday overtime was not, in terms of the employment agreement, a manda...