YM v RP LCRO 238/2012 (31 March 2016) [pdf, 54 KB]
...professional standards. (f) Ms RP’s contact with Mr YM had been limited. Her information to the Police was in large part based on hearsay evidence. (g) Ms RP had minimal understanding of Mr YM’s involvement with Mrs EW, and was not able to responsibly comment on it. (h) Sources from whom Ms RP had gleaned information were not disinterested parties. (i) Elements of Ms RP’s statement were demonstrably untrue. [14] By way of remedy, Mr YM seeks compensation of $15,000, and for...