Search Results

1. OIA-122013.pdf [pdf, 765 KB]

   ...the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information relating to Firearms Prohibition Orders (FPOs). On 9 May 2025, your request was transferred in full under section 14 of the Act by the Police, to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) for response. Specifically, you requested: 1. Can you tell me how many breaches of FPO’s have been prosecuted since the law came into force, year by year. If you know the outcomes, can you please advise the penalties imposed in each case. 2. C...

2. Baker, Ralph and Huang v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 413) and Yu (not participating in appeal) [2018] NZREADT 64 [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...into the complaint, the Committee decided pursuant to s 78(b) of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 (“the Act”) to inquire into the conduct of Mr Huang and Mr Ralph. They were advised of the Committee’s decisions and asked to provide their responses to the complaint, including (but not limited to), specific questions. Both provided responses, which were provided to the Committee through their (then) solicitors. The Committee’s decision [6] The Committee found that: [...

3. OIA-105083_Part3.pdf [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...combined into one OIA request. - A list of all briefings, reports, aide memoirs and memos produced or received by the Minister in his capacity as Minister of Justice between June 1, 2021 and June 30, 2021. - A copy of the documents referred to in WPQ response 27314 (2021). Once we have established what information we need to look for, we can search through JAX to see if we have any recent WPQs which cover the request for titles (this request is a common WPQ question) and any recent OIA...

4. OIA-120181.pdf [pdf, 843 KB]

   ...national total for the District Court. On 11 April 2025, the Ministry extended the timeframe to respond to your request, to 30 April 2025, under section 15A (1) of the Act as additional time was needed to collate the information requested. In response to part 1 of your request, please see Table 1 attached, which provides the total number of cases disposed in the Westport District Court, where a JAT hearing was involved, between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2024. As at 3 April 2...

5. Juror Satisfaction Survey 2023 Results Report [pdf, 539 KB]

   ...Appendix D: 2023 survey questions .................................................................................24 Appendix E: 2023 survey locations ...................................................................................25 Appendix F: Response rates .............................................................................................26 3 Juror Satisfaction Survey 2023 Results overview - infographic 89% Overall satisfaction What our jurors said they liked...

6. TO Ltd v DD Ltd [2019] NZDT 1462 (11 December 2019) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...TO LTD has lost a substantial amount of its product due to the failure of the seals. 2. TO LTD claims the sum of $14,999.00 for losses associated with the tubes with failed seals. 3. The issues to be determined are as follows: a. Is DD LTD responsible for the failure of the foils? b. If so, is its liability limited to the cost of the tubes and foils? Is DD LTD responsible for the failure of the foils? 4. The Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 (CCLA) governs the sale of good...

7. OIA-121263.pdf [pdf, 807 KB]

   ...April 2025 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry), requesting under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), the amount paid to Waitangi Tribunal lawyers and consultants over the last five years. This request was made following our previous response to you (our ref: OIA 119593). Specifically, you requested: 1. I would like to request a breakdown of which lawyers or legal practices were paid for legal costs as recorded over the past 5 years and by year and amount by year. 2. I...

8. Fenwick - Whakapoungakau 24 (2011) 45 Waiariki MB 252 (45 WAR 252) [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...be dealt with in the new year by way of separate judgment. Submissions for the Trustees [5] Mr Dowthwaite submitted that the application had been filed as a consequence of the outcome of the owners’ meeting. The trustees considered it their responsibility to make application to the Court for the appointment of the successful nominee Dr Habib. [6] Mr Dowthwaite submitted that whether or not any other nominees should be appointed was a matter for the Court. Subsequently, Mr Bidois...

9. M Dwan v Park No 3 Trust & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 11 [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...65, [2010] 3 NZLR 486 at [129]. Page | 4 [9] Mr van den Dorpe was not a party to the settlement He was the plasterer alleged to be responsible for the damage arising from the faulty cladding. Mark van den Dorpe did not file a final response and he took no part in the hearing of this matter. Mr van den Dorpe had previously provided affidavit evidence for an unsuccessful removal application which I have taken into account despite him not being available for questioning....

10. LCRO 59/2016 and 61/2016 DE and QV v Standards Committee (27 September 2018) [pdf, 175 KB]

    ...or cavalier, not that I suggest such of Mr DE. [10] The Committee did not accept the suggestion made by Mr BC as to the responsibilities of each lawyer and said: “The Standards Committee was satisfied that all three practitioners were equally responsible for ensuring that the firm’s nominee company lending complied with applicable regulations”.1 [11] The firm of FGH Ltd had eight partners at the time the various issues raised by Mr BC arose, but there is no indication on the C...