Search Results

1. FC Submissions on contributions to cost of service provision (MOJ0611) [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...Registrar, Family Court (at the Court your case was heard). 2 If you have applied under Part C: Circumstances of the case , you need to provide a copy of your submission to all other applicants and respondents to these proceedings. For respondents only Response to this submission Complete Part D: Responding to this submission if you are making a response to this submission. Sign Part D and send the entire form* to The Registrar, Family Court (at the Court this case was heard at) *Do n...

2. Ashcroft v Phillips - Mohaka A4 (2005) 180 Napier MB 210 (180 NA 210) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...that the term of the lease is to run from 1 March 1998 to 31 August 1998. The rental to be paid is not specified in the lease agreement, although it does provide that the lessee will pay the annual rent in advance of two payments per year and will be responsible for the payment of all rates. 8. The applicant has been occupying and farming the Mohaka A4 Block, in conjunction with the Mohaka B10 and Mohaka B14 Blocks, since 1 March 1998 up to the present date. The material available on the...

3. [2020] NZEnvC 002 Echave v Thames Coromandel District Council [pdf, 411 KB]

   ...amended by the Council) set the boundaries of the consent able to be granted by the Court, which could not therefore approve a 'controlled' (fenced and ticketed) event on New Year's Eve, as sought in the appeal. (b) Requested a response from the appellant by 11 March 2019 as to whether the appeal would be withdrawn or amended and explained that the Society Memorandum of the Counsel for the Friends of Williamson Park Society seeking costs, dated 4 April 2019. A "...

4. [2019] NZEnvC 140 The Friends of Sherwood Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 399 KB]

   ...was completed on 28 September Friday 2018. [5] On 24 December 2018, the applicants advised by memorandum that they sought to continue with their application for full enforcement orders. [6] The Court then directed that the Council was to file a response to the applicants' memorandum by 18 January 2019. It so responded by memorandum and with an amended application for strike out. DOC also filed a memorandum on 18 January 2019 supporting the strike out application. The grounds of...

5. NT v GF Ltd [2023] NZDT 92 (13 March 2023).pdf [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...satisfied that GF Ltd breached the CGA as it provided incorrect advice to NT regarding visa requirements. 22. BT said that booking was sent to NT and he was asked to check it. The itinerary states under “Other Information” that “we are not responsible for visa status and transit visa required.” The itinerary later states “You are responsible for obtaining all entry and exit visa, health and other required documents.” 23. If NT had not asked for any advice or information ab...

6. [2023] NZEmpC 110 Hamilton Hindin Greene Ltd v Smalley [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...be reviewed at a later stage. [18] Mr Smalley sought 2B costs of $17,566.50, making a claim for that band and time allocation for each step taken in the litigation up to the point where the notice of discontinuance was filed. [19] HHG’s response was that an award of that amount would be unreasonable and unjust. It sought adjustments which, if accepted, would reduce its costs exposure to $6,214. Mr Smalley’s claim in more detail [20] Mr Smalley’s claim was itemised...

7. ZH v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 17 (10 February 2024) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...informed? 6. The relevant law that relates to contract is the Contracts and Commercial Law Act 2017. Whether ZH is liable for damages to the rental car? 7. C Ltd claim that the rental car was not returned to their premises and therefore the responsibility of the car and any damage was with ZH. That she was to return the car within the period of time on her contract and the time it was parked at the [petrol station] was not within the timeframe or at their premises. However, in...

8. KQ & LT v SG [2023] NZDT 287 (13 June 2023) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...duty of care to each other take reasonable care to ensure they do not cause damage to the property of another or cause another person to suffer loss. Drivers of vehicles are included under this umbrella of people who are subject to this duty. General responsibilities of drivers include that they must always drive with care and according to the conditions. The Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004 (LTR) explains more specific rules that drivers must abide by in New Zealand, and these rules a...

9. [2023] NZEmpC 157 Whakarongorau Aotearoa New Zealand Telehealth Services LP v Public Service Association, Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...– Health New Zealand in relation to the impact of the strike notices and contingency planning. [7] On 12 September 2023, a representative of the plaintiff emailed the defendants, identifying the employees engaged in the Early Mental Health Response (EMHR) team who the plaintiff considered were providing life preserving services under sch 1B cl 3 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). Schedule 1B of the Act sets out a “Code of good faith for [the] public health sector...

10. TN v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 89 (7 February 2024) [pdf, 149 KB]

    ...have known that the house cladding had or might have contained asbestos and therefore should have taken appropriate measures to ensure fibres were not released? (ii) If the building contractor did not act with reasonable care and skill, is U Ltd responsible for the contractor’s actions/ inactions? (iii) If yes to (ii), has TN established the asbestos fibres found by [Asbestos testing company] in 2019 were from the work completed to install the window? (iv) Is TN entitled t...