Search Results

1. Chand v Shearer [2016] NZIACDT 12 (18 March 2016) [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...little or nothing to the complaint. At least from 22 August 2014, Ms Shearer was aware she had not filed the request, and did not file it until 22 October 2014. When she did file it she explained to Immigration New Zealand, the delay was her personal responsibility. Various elements of Ms Shearer’s management are potentially negligent as they were causative of the failure to file the request in a timely way. They include, the initial failure to check she had in fact filed the request, he...

2. Appleby Building Ltd v C Alva LCRO 117 / 2009 (12 October 2009) [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...for the purpose of causing unnecessary embarrassment, distress, or inconvenience to another person's reputation, interests, or occupation. [6] Compensation in the sum of the wasted costs of the Company was sought. Privilege [7] In his response to the complaint Mr Alva asserted that he was unable to disclose information that was privileged to his client, Helmsdale Limited. This is clearly not the case under the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006. By s 147 of the Lawyers and...

3. Abernethy v Coughlan [pdf, 29 KB]

   ...the position of project manager imposed on him a duty of personal responsibility and care. He was paid as an employee of the company to carry out this task. The Tribunal therefore found that as the project manager or administrator, Mr Humphrey was responsible for supervising workmanship unless someone else was appointed to that role. The Tribunal did not consider that the fact Mr Humphrey worked part-time as project manager was sufficient to conclude that he did not owe a duty of care...

4. BORA Border Processing (Arrivals and Departures) Levy Bill [pdf, 302 KB]

   ...broadly, the Bill aims to ensure that New Zealand’s interest in protecting its borders is upheld. 5. In the case of both Acts, the Bill’s levy provisions are supported by a compliance audit regime intended to ascertain the extent to which those responsible for paying or collecting the levy are doing so; the appropriate amounts are being or have been paid; and statements, accounts, and records are being or have been kept. 6. MPI and Customs have advised us that both of the compliance...

5. PD v JL LCRO 26/2015 (22 June 2016) [pdf, 38 KB]

   ...in December 2006. He also expressed concerns about Mr JL not having enforced the terms of the Deed. Standards Committee [6] The Committee considered Mr PD’s complaint, and an affidavit filed by Mr JL in the Family Court proceeding. Mr JL’s response acknowledged that there were minor errors in the will. However, he says those concerns were resolved by the sons having executed the Deed, and were not of the same kind or substance that Mr PD’s complaint was concerned with. [7]...

6. WA v XB LCRO 130/2012 (18 March 2015) [pdf, 33 KB]

   ...were unreasonable or unfair, or that she was responsible for costs or other consequences to Ms WA after the memorandum was filed. [9] The Committee considered all of the materials the parties had provided, noting Ms WA’s concerns and Ms XB’s responses. [10] The Committee was unconcerned about the delays in Ms XB returning phone calls, and her fees, although it considered Ms XB should have “assumed control of and responsibility for the file” earlier. [11] It found tha...

7. Notes from Crown Maori Relations hui Palmerston North 21 May 2018 [pdf, 409 KB]

   ...services and learning environments. Mainstream is failing our people. If children aren’t learning they end up falling through the cracks and in the correctional system. Prevention is key. • Whānau Ora – is Government’s most innovative and responsive government policy yet it isn’t adequately resourced. The wellbeing and Māori-led focus is positive and works. • Kaumātua – need to be recognised as valuable and important, and supported in any way possible. Possible Cr...

8. Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society [PDF, 487 KB]

   ...for them why make PC1 any more confusing than it already is. Council can encourage sector schemes outside of the regulatory process. Maintaining certified sector schemes within PC1 particularly where it is says “a scheme group or organisation responsible for preparing and assisting with the implementation” raises issues of liability Sector schemes are not responsible for preparing Farm Environment Plan the farm owner is 6. Policies 12 and 13 The time frame is far too long...

9. Taueki - Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Māori Reservation (2005) 154 Aotea MB 96 (154 AOT 96) [pdf, 353 KB]

   ...that is the subject matter of the proceedings, or that may be affected by an order that may be in the proceedings." Following referral of the application I directed that the parties affected be served and asked to reply within fourteen days. Responses were received from Allan Ross of the Department of Conservation and chairperson of the Horowhenua Lake Domain Board ("the Board") on 1 June, Barry Gilliand of the Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council on 2 June and James Brought...

10. Information Sharing Agreement between the Ministry of Justice and the Crown Law Office [pdf, 165 KB]

    ...secure system that protects the information against unauthorised use, modification, access and disclosure. 6 Safeguards to protect privacy 16. The Parties will: 16.1. Create a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) which details roles and responsibilities of each Party for the information sharing under this Agreement; 16.2. Ensure careful design and implementation of the extraction process to ensure that only information pursuant to this Agreement is shared; 16.3. Develop detail...