Search Results

1. Eichelbaum v CAC303 & Anor (ruling) [2016] NZREADT 3 [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...for the complainant appellant, but those have been put to one side while we rule on the nature of the appeal to us. [9] Mr Katz QC has made extensive and very pertinent submissions to us on that issue. We shall summarise those submissions and the response of Mr Eichelbaum, but then discuss the response submissions from Mr Hodge on behalf of the Authority because, broadly, we agree with Mr Hodge’s submissions and they, to quite a degree, follow much of the reasoning of Mr Katz in his s...

2. LCRO 196/2016 GY v SO (15 September 2017) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...“for a little bit” the receptionist asked Ms GY to “go ahead”. Ms GY proceeded with her question until the phone connection was interrupted. (d) Approximately fifteen minutes later Ms SO left a message on Ms GY’s voicemail. Ms SO’s response [12] In her response Ms SO refers to the receptionist’s record of that conversation, namely, that:3 (a) The receptionist informed Ms GY that Ms SO was unavailable and asked if he could take a message. (b) Ms GY asked to spe...

3. Harvey v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 58 (30 August 2012) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...indicated in relation to other complaints that he does not have client records, as they are in the hands of the liquidator of Living New Zealand Ltd. [28] The Code has the force of law (see sections 37–39 and 44 of the Act). It is implausible that any responsible liquidator would impede Mr Standing from obtaining a copy of his client record to respond to a complaint, given the legal duties on Mr Standing in relation to records. [29] Mr Standing had produced no evidence he has attempte...

4. RH v LV LCRO 189 / 2011 (25 September 2012) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...with the failure of the Practitioner to have had an instructing solicitor. The Committee was not impressed by the various explanations offered by the Practitioner for not having arranged an instructing solicitor, and found the Practitioner’s responses entirely unconvincing. The Committee considered that this conduct reached the section 351 jurisdictional threshold. At paragraph 7, the Committee wrote: The Committee finds that [the Practitioner] is guilty of conduct unbecoming i...

5. E50 Myfanwy Eaves - Historic Heritage - EIC - Council [pdf, 809 KB]

   ...War II aircraft at the Auckland War Memorial Museum. 2.3 In specific reference to this application is my role of Registrar Transport at the Powerhouse Museum (Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences) Sydney, Australia (2000-2006). In that role I was responsible for the co-ordination of documentation and logistics for the freighting of objects and exhibitions nationally and 1739 3 internationally. Australia is a signatory to the UNIDROIT and CITES Conventions1 so that all impo...

6. E58 Russell Green - EIC - ETNZ and ACEL [pdf, 6.4 MB]

   ...name is Russell Lenard Hamilton Green. I am the Legal and Rules Advisor to Emirates Team New Zealand Limited (ETNZ) and America's Event Limited (ACEL). As the representative team of the Royal New Zealand Yacht Squadron (RNZVS), ETNZ has sole responsibility for the conduct of the 36th America's Cup (AC36) defence, including the organisation of the event and has established ACEL as the entity responsible for event management. 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 I have already filed a brief...

7. E36 Rebecca Skidmore - Urban Design - EIC - Council [pdf, 841 KB]

   ...page 0045 onwards. 14 E8, page 0255 onwards. 15 E6, page 0128 onwards. 16 E7, page 0195 onwards. 17 E19, page 1060 onwards. 1597 5 (c) An update following expert witness conferencing, referring to the JWS where appropriate, and a response to issues raised in the Applicant’s evidence (Update Following Expert Witness Conferencing / Response to Applicant’s Evidence); (d) Comments on draft conditions and proposed mitigation (Conditions / Mitigation); and (e) Con...

8. E38 Jon Styles - Noise - EIC - Council [pdf, 854 KB]

   ...(Executive Summary); (b) An assessment of the Application, including an overview of the key points from the Report (Assessment of the Application); (c) An update following expert witness conferencing, referring to the JWS where appropriate, and a response to the Applicant’s evidence (Update Following Expert Witness Conferencing / Response to Applicant’s Evidence); (d) Comments on draft conditions and proposed mitigation (Conditions / Mitigation); and (e) Conclusions....

9. E50 Myfanwy Eaves - Historic Heritage - EIC - Council V2 [pdf, 810 KB]

   ...War II aircraft at the Auckland War Memorial Museum. 2.3 In specific reference to this application is my role of Registrar Transport at the Powerhouse Museum (Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences) Sydney, Australia (2000-2006). In that role I was responsible for the co-ordination of documentation and logistics for the freighting of objects and exhibitions nationally and internationally. Australia is a signatory to the UNIDROIT and CITES Conventions1 so that all import and export docu...

10. E50 Myfanwy Eaves Historic Heritage EIC Council [pdf, 810 KB]

    ...War II aircraft at the Auckland War Memorial Museum. 2.3 In specific reference to this application is my role of Registrar Transport at the Powerhouse Museum (Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences) Sydney, Australia (2000-2006). In that role I was responsible for the co-ordination of documentation and logistics for the freighting of objects and exhibitions nationally and internationally. Australia is a signatory to the UNIDROIT and CITES Conventions1 so that all import and export docu...