Search Results

1. LCRO 126/2013 MZ v JK [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...it’s interests over the interests of others, including the Trust, BCSL and the Body Corporate. On review, Mr MZ’s complaint and review application must be viewed from that perspective. Alleged undertaking [31] The authors of Professional Responsibility in New Zealand say that an undertaking is a clear promise, with an express or implied time for performance, given in a practitioner’s professional capacity.7 [32] As clarity is prerequisite to an undertaking, if an alleged...

2. Heng v Yap [2014] NZIACDT 110 (10 October 2014) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...equally does not have jurisdiction over New Zealand law; and particularly has no jurisdiction over professional standards imposed because of Mr Yap holding a licence as a New Zealand professional. [13] This decision is only concerned with professional responsibilities that arise under New Zealand law, which Mr Yap chose to accept to gain the benefits of New Zealand professional registration. There is no existing decision dealing with Mr Yap’s professional responsibilities in relation t...

3. Varela v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 85 (15 September 2014) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...discussed. [33] The Registrar has elected not to apply for costs of investigation, and representation at the hearing. Given Ms Devi’s alleged inability to meet any order, the approach is not surprising. [34] Ms Devi has generally resisted admitting responsibility for the complaints, and the Tribunal has incurred the cost of dealing with them. However, there would be an element of futility in making an order for the costs of the hearings, and I will accordingly not make such an order....

4. Vikashwarjeet and Devi v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 82 (15 September 2014) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...discussed. [35] The Registrar has elected not to apply for costs of investigation, and representation at the hearing. Given Ms Devi’s alleged inability to meet any order, the approach is not surprising. [36] Ms Devi has generally resisted admitting responsibility for the complaints, and the Tribunal has incurred the cost of dealing with them. However, there would be an element of futility in making an order for the costs of the hearings, and I will accordingly not make such an order....

5. Naidu v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 83 (15 September 2014) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...discussed. [34] The Registrar has elected not to apply for costs of investigation, and representation at the hearing. Given Ms Devi’s alleged inability to meet any order, the approach is not surprising. [35] Ms Devi has generally resisted admitting responsibility for the complaints, and the Tribunal has incurred the cost of dealing with them. However, there would be an element of futility in making an order for the costs of the hearings, and I will accordingly not make such an order....

6. Khan v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 84 (15 September 2014) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...discussed. [33] The Registrar has elected not to apply for costs of investigation, and representation at the hearing. Given Ms Devi’s alleged inability to meet any order, the approach is not surprising. [34] Ms Devi has generally resisted admitting responsibility for the complaints, and the Tribunal has incurred the cost of dealing with them. However, there would be an element of futility in making an order for the costs of the hearings, and I will accordingly not make such an order....

7. Chand v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 80 (15 September 2014) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...discussed. [33] The Registrar has elected not to apply for costs of investigation, and representation at the hearing. Given Ms Devi’s alleged inability to meet any order, the approach is not surprising. [34] Ms Devi has generally resisted admitting responsibility for the complaints, and the Tribunal has incurred the cost of dealing with them. However, there would be an element of futility in making an order for the costs of the hearings, and I will accordingly not make such an order....

8. Lake - Ngarara West B3B Trust (2003) 134 Aotea MB 20 (134 AOT 20) [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...making such an assessment the Court, taking a broad overview, should give due regard to all relevant considerations including whether or not the land was included unfairly. Turning then to the present case, it is common ground that the duties and responsibilities of trustees can be onerous. Those difficulties are exacerbated where the subject land is marginal in economic terms. That does not mean the land is not of significance to the beneficial owners, their whanau and hapu. So is the c...

9. Trustees of Tuaropaki Trust - Tuaropaki E (2002) 77 Taupō MB 25 (77 TPO 25) [pdf, 340 KB]

   ...charge over Tuaropaki E. There are four directors of the Company, including the three trustees mentioned previously - Samuel Andrews, Brian Jones and Tumanako Wereta along with a representative from Mighty River Power Limited, Michael Kedian. For their responsibilities as directors, since 1998, the three trustees have been paid the total sum of $195,000.00 by way of fees. The current level of fees for the directors are: for Mr Andrews $18,000.00; Mr Jones, $15,000.00; Messrs Wereta and Ked...

10. [2021] NZIACDT 6 - TB v Registrar of Immigration Advisers (22 March 2021) [pdf, 212 KB]

    ...appellant on one matter. Submissions of the appellant [34] In his submissions attached to the appeal form (2 November 2020), the appellant says that when he went to the adviser he was not sure of the level of his qualification, so it was the responsibility of the adviser to check whether it was at level 6 or level 7. At their first meeting, he provided the adviser with his certificate and transcript but the adviser was more concerned about getting the money. 1 Immigration...