Search Results

1. LCRO 74/2020 NS v AD (29 January 2021) [pdf, 285 KB]

   ...affidavit from Ms V. Ms V confirmed that Ms AD had difficulty contacting Mr NS for updates, and that she became increasingly worried about progress with her residence visa application; in particular, that she would be deported from New Zealand. Response [30] In submissions to the Complaints Service dated 12 June 2018, Mr NS said: (a) He was experienced but not an expert in immigration matters. (b) He had engaged Dr S to assist with the rejected residence visa application. Dr S...

2. OIA-118546.pdf [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...appointment to date. On 7 February 2025, the Ministry contacted you to advise you that your request for information was granted, but that further time was required to finalise the information for release. You were further advised that you could expect a response on or before 18 March 2025. The Ministry acknowledges that we are responding to you well outside of the time we previously indicated and appreciates your patience while we finalised our response to your request. In response...

3. [2024] NZEnvC 149 Learning Houses Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 466 KB]

   ...stabilisation. • Contact details for contractor who will undertake stabilisation of the site including date(s) expected on site. • Alternatives/contingencies proposed if the contractor referred to above becomes unavailable. • Details of site responsibilities, specifically who is responsible for erosion and sediment controls and stabilisation processes over the specified period. Stormwater 27. All stormwater from buildings and paved areas on the site must be collected and di...

4. Naera v Fenwick - Whakapoungakau 24 block (2010) 15 Waiariki MB 279 (15 WAR 279) [pdf, 379 KB]

   ...the Applicants Dowthwaite & Co, Rotorua for the First Respondents Mike Garnham, Auckland for the Second Respondent 15 Waiariki MB 280 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction [1] The Applicants’ claims [4] The Trustees’ responses [9] Issues [13] Background [16] Subsidiary companies [18] Meetings of owners 2004-2009 [21] Court ordered meeting 2009 [24] Variations to the trust order: 2004-2009 [25] Tikitere Project Agreement (TPA) [29] Procedural hi...

5. OIA-113748.pdf [pdf, 7 MB]

   ...Justice Select Committee held on 18 June 2024. On 31 of July 2024, the Ministry contacted you, informing you that a decision to grant you your request had been made, however more time was required to prepare the information for release. In response to your request, please see the document table below. Some documents have been refused under section 18(d) of the Act, as they are publicly available. Some information has also been withheld under the following provisions of the Act:...

6. Election Access Fund Evaluation Report (Accessible Version) [docx, 236 KB]

   ...Act, including consulting relevant parties, establishing the Fund (including setting up systems and processes to manage the Fund) and promoting it. The Act has few legislative settings or definitions. This was considered a strength, as it allowed for responsive and flexible Fund design and implementation. Disabled people led and were actively involved in establishing and implementing the Fund. The Commission consulted with a range of parties, including disabled people and groups, Disabled Peopl...

7. Process evaluation of the Election Access Fund Act (2020): after the first use of the Fund (Read only) [docx, 773 KB]

   ...Act, including consulting relevant parties, establishing the Fund (including setting up systems and processes to manage the Fund) and promoting it. The Act has few legislative settings or definitions. This was considered a strength, as it allowed for responsive and flexible Fund design and implementation. Disabled people led and were actively involved in establishing and implementing the Fund. The Commission consulted with a range of parties, including disabled people and groups, Disabled Peopl...

8. Process evaluation of the Election Access Fund Act (2020): after the first use of the Fund [pdf, 776 KB]

   ...including consulting relevant parties, establishing the Fund (including setting up systems and processes to manage the Fund) and promoting it. The Act has few legislative settings or definitions. This was considered a strength, as it allowed for responsive and flexible Fund design and implementation. Disabled people led and were actively involved in establishing and implementing the Fund. The Commission consulted with a range of parties, including disabled people and groups, Disable...

9. RIS Regulatory Systems Justice Amendment Bill package [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...2024-12-06 11:51:05 Page 6 of 47 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Section 1: Diagnosing the policy problem What is the context behind the policy problem and how is the status quo expected to develop? 1. The Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) is responsible for 53 regulatory systems which are grouped into seven regulatory areas. Stewardship of these systems is an obligation under the Public Service Act 2020. 2. The Ministry’s Policy Group collects and assesses information f...

10. [2011] NZEmpC 11 Bernard Matthews NZ Ltd v Puhia [pdf, 117 KB]

    ...Puhia‟s and the Union‟s letters, he expected more about the basis of the grievance because it was not clear to him “whether the challenge was as to process, or the grounds for the dismissal, …”. That is not consistent with the company‟s responses which included acknowledging the grievance brought to its attention by Mr Puhia and reiterated by the Union and failing to make any response that would have been consistent with a lack of understanding or an expectation of fur...