GS v TM LCRO 133 / 2011 (20 January 2012) [pdf, 81 KB]
...investigate further. [13] The Applicant referred to the electricity authority’s “Information paper on ownership and maintenance of customer service lines”. He considered that the 4 Practitioner ought to have identified who owned and was responsible for maintaining the works and what rights of access they had. [14] The Practitioner’s response to the review application was to refer to his letter to the Standards Committee, and confirm that it was not part of his...