Search Results

1. Hassan v Woodcock - Manukau E2B1 (Rangikohu Marae) (2023) 262 Taitokerau MB 164 (262 TTK 164) [pdf, 325 KB]

   ...to the reservation. Ko te hātepe ture o te tono nei Procedural History [14] On the 20th of April 2023, I issued directions that the trustees were to respond to the application filed by Ms Hassan within 21 working days and that the trustees’ responses were to be filed with the Court and served on the applicant. Following that a judicial conference was scheduled for the 31st of May 2023. [15] Following the issuing of that direction, the Court were advised that responsible trus...

2. UN v OL LCRO 49 / 2012 (9 April 2013) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...and it carried with it the implication that he (Mr UN) had committed the offence of misleading the Official Assignee, contrary to s 440 of the Insolvency Act 2006. Mr UN believes that the practitioner has abused his position. Practitioner’s response to the complaint [3] The practitioner responded to the complaint on [2012]. In essence he says: Mr UN and the practitioner’s client have been involved in disputes over many years. Most of these have involved proceedings before...

3. Rua - Kotipu 2 (2003) 81 Ōpōtiki MB 35 (81 OPO 35) [pdf, 429 KB]

   ...without his knowledge and without the consent of the trustees or owners of the block. In his estimation, Harangi was responsible for the cutting down of 475 Radiata Pines, for no real purpose resulting in the land being left in an untidy state. In response, Harangi claimed that the felling of trees in 1996-1997 did not occur. Instead, the trees were transplanted from Kotipu 1 (a neighboring block) back onto Kotipu 2. This was done to allow her to build her house in accordance with an oc...

4. External Sector Feedback Document Audit and Monitoring Policy [pdf, 393 KB]

   Audit and Monitoring Policy for Legal Aid Providers Consultation response report Introduction 1. On 9 April 2018, we sought feedback on proposed changes to our legal aid provider Auditing and Monitoring Policy (Audit Policy), and Audit Terms of Reference. The proposed changes would add additional risk assessment metrics used during the provider selection process for the annual Quality and Value audit round. 2. The consultation documents were circulated to the New...

5. OIA-109789.pdf [pdf, 910 KB]

   ...every year over the past five years. Could I please request the same figure for last year (2023)? As was clarified in the original request, could the figure please include both active and disposed cases. Your request has been referred to me for response, as it falls within my responsibilities as Group Manager, Courts and Tribunals, Regional Service Delivery, and is being managed in accordance with the provisions of the Act. I understand this request is seeking an update on da...

6. Your responsibilities

   On this page: Your responsibilities Who can complete an MCCD If the person who died is not your patient If you are unavailable when your patient dies Your responsibilities When a person dies, a doctor or nurse practitioner who has been involved with the person’s care, must: complete a medical certificate cause of death (MCCD) if the death is due to natural causes like illness or age-related decline or report the death to the coroner if it appears to be unnatural, suspicious, du...

   Located in:

   1. Coroners Court >
   2. Information for doctors and nurse practitioners

7. 5_WK-respose-to-Regional-Councils-request-for-information-under-section-92-final-v2.pdf [pdf, 538 KB]

   ...the proposed instream standard of no greater than a QMCI change of 15% during the operation of the project or greater than 20% at the completion of the project? The two triggers are for different purposes. The proposed clarity trigger is to responsively manage erosion and sediment control devices. Not achieving the target triggers immediate actions to improve erosion and sediment control practices and event reporting. The proposed QMCI trigger relates to regular but less frequen...

8. N v K LCRO 03 / 2009 (3 February 2009) [pdf, 17 KB]

   ...the inquiry of the Standards Committee and to undertake enquiries of his or her own. In this matter the application review was made to this office on 9 January 2009. Ms K responded to that application Ms K on 4 February 2009. Ms N replied to that response from Ms on 15 February 2009. This review was conducted on the basis of that correspondence and the file of the Standards Committee which was also made available to me. The parties have consented to this matter being considered withou...

9. Briefing for incoming Minister 2017 - Attorney-General [pdf, 1015 KB]

   ...overview of key aspects of the rule of law, including the quality, accessibility and effectiveness of the law. Particular points of focus in this context are the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and key legislation affecting the courts. You will be responsible for reporting on consistency of Bills with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. You will also be responsible for a number of appointments including to the Parole Board and the Legislation Design and Advisory Committee, which...

10. Infrastructure Funding and Financing Bill Advice [pdf, 94 KB]

    ...funding and financing model for the timely and responsive provision of infrastructure to support housing demands. The Bill proposes to do this by setting a multi-year levy which is to be paid by beneficiaries of infrastructure and collected by the responsible territorial authority by way of a rate. 7. Any person may propose that a levy be authorised to fund eligible costs to support the financing of the construction of eligible infrastructure. The proposer must give the proposal to the...