Search Results

1. [2021] - NZREADT 09 - Complaints Assessment Committee 1905 v Papuni (24 February 2021) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...However, the Tribunal found that at the very least, she knew that something was amiss, and ought to have appreciated the nature of the scheme. [28] Given the seriousness of the conduct, the Tribunal considered that the appropriate disciplinary response should be cancellation or suspension of Ms Taylor’s licence. The Tribunal imposed a penalty of censure, suspension of Ms Taylor’s licence for 18 months, and an order for training. [29] In Complaints Assessment Committee 20006 v...

2. Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited [pdf, 45 KB]

   ...ninth respondents (with the exception of the sixth respondents who were removed earlier in the proceedings). The only outstanding matters that were not resolved in that determination include the issue of whether the tenth respondent (Mr Nachum) is responsible for any of the claimants’ loss, and the consequent allocation of responsibility amongst any liable respondents as to what each will have to pay to the claimant. Notwithstanding those outstanding matters however, the finding...

3. The Treaty of Waitangi Past and Present Teacher's Guide [pdf, 8.8 MB]

   ...://7~ c G{~ ) Section 3 Social Organisation Section 4 t-"1 fiillT. Social Organisation Time, Continuity & Change Section 5 . • .i :"::.},' Time, Continuity & Change How people organise themselves in response to challenge and crisis. How and 'why people exercise their rights and meet their responsibilities. r~Ti1, .. .. •• iliHW,J:\ How people organise themselves in response to challenge and crisis. How and why people exercise...

4. LCRO 47/2016 FD v QB (16 October 2018) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...to be able to determine this aspect of concern to Mr FD. [58] Mr QB’s fee represents marginally more than the value of the time and labour recorded if the value of the time recorded on [Date] is excluded. It is accepted that the firm was responsible to the executors and beneficiaries for performing the services properly, and that it did. It is also accepted that the timesheets accurately record the services provided. [59] A reasonable level of skill and specialised knowled...

5. National Standards Committee 2 v Paulson Wilson [2021] NZLCDT 16 (14 May 2021) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...only lasted a period of six days. It is impossible to speculate, so we do not, whether the offending might have continued if it had not been detected. [38] We accept that the practitioner was young and inexperienced and that she has accepted responsibility at a personal level for her actions. [39] We remind ourselves of the need to impose the least restrictive outcome.10 [40] The Daniels decision also emphasise the right of the public to observe the profession’s disciplinary bo...

6. D J Bethell Family Trust - Rangitatau Waitōtara 3C2B2 and 3C2B3 Trust (2019) 408 Aotea MB 210 (408 AOT 210) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...The issues for the Court include what steps if any need to be taken to review the current use of the land. The eligibility of the current lessee for consideration for any future use of the land is also an issue. Finally, the role of the current responsible trustees needs to be carefully considered in the context of whether they have fulfilled their duties. For completeness I note that under the terms of the current trust order the trustees were due to re- tire so that an election co...

7. Bloor v Pomana - Matawihi 1A (2020) 82 Tākitimu MB 136 (82 TKT 136) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...leased informally. At the hearing, Mr Studer confirmed that one of these blocks were leased by the Chestermans. Procedural history [8] The application of Mr Bloor was filed on 4 December 2019. A copy was issued to the trustees for their response. The trustees filed a draft housing policy on 4 December 2019. [9] Rose Hesketh, a beneficial owner, purported to convene a general meeting of owners on 25 August 2019. Following advice from Mr Bloor, a subsequent meeting was convene...

8. Te Manutukutuku Issue 2 [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   T e R oopu W hakamana i te T iriti 0 Waitangi Te Tari Ture Tuarua Noema 1989 INTRODUCTION The response from our first issue of Te Manutukutuku has been extraordinarily positive as recipients have sought additional copies for distribution to other agencies and to . key people within their own organisations. It is clear that decision-makers at all levels have been starved of information about the Waitangi Tribunal duties, responsibilities and schedule of activities. Therefore, Te...

9. Baker v High Court (Strike-Out Application) [2021] NZHRRT 56 [pdf, 543 KB]

   ...repeats arguments which the plaintiff has unsuccessfully advanced in all three senior courts. [9] The case as set out in the statement of claim includes the following key assertions: [9.1] The Commissioner of Inland Revenue “departed from her responsibilities” under the Tax Administration Act 1994 and the Child Support Act 1991. [9.2] The High Court judgment given on 7 February 2019 and the Court of Appeal judgments dated 11 September 2019 and 29 March 2021 “perpetuate this di...

10. LCRO 196/2021 DB v HP and JK (28 April 2022) [pdf, 144 KB]

    ...preliminary view. [21] On 22 October 2021, a LSO telephoned Mr HP and informed him that the Committee had reached a preliminary view that it would take no further action on Mr DB’s complaint. He was advised that the Committee did not require a response from him. Mr HP confirmed that he would provide any information to the Committee if it required him to do so. [22] The Standards Committee identified the substance of Mr DB’s complaint as being complaint that the trust deed...