Search Results

1. LCRO 196/2021 DB v HP and JK (28 April 2022) [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...preliminary view. [21] On 22 October 2021, a LSO telephoned Mr HP and informed him that the Committee had reached a preliminary view that it would take no further action on Mr DB’s complaint. He was advised that the Committee did not require a response from him. Mr HP confirmed that he would provide any information to the Committee if it required him to do so. [22] The Standards Committee identified the substance of Mr DB’s complaint as being complaint that the trust deed...

2. [2023] NZEnvC 075 Gray v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...site for the exception to the “avoid” policy (reason 5). There is nothing in the District Plan to support this. [6] The appellants note that they formally invited the Council to reconsider its position in an email dated 13 October 2022. No response was received. [7] The appellants submit the Council’s case overall failed to acknowledge that the District Plan incentivised indigenous biodiversity by providing a pathway for residential activity4 that would, without that, be b...

3. LCRO 114/2022 WB v XD (22 July 2022) [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...seek to have the Protection Order rescinded in the High Court. I would like to add restitution in this amount to my complaint”. [20] Mr XD was provided opportunity to respond to the second complaint. [21] Mr XD responded on 12 April 2022. That response was provided to Mr WB and opportunity given to him to reply to it. [22] The Standards Committee distilled the substance of Mr WB’s complaint as concerns that: (a) Mr XD had failed to bring to his attention that the protection...

4. [2022] NZEmpC 40 Ngawaka v Global Security Solutions Ltd [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...called to advise of his unavailability but could not recollect who he spoke to. [24] Mr Ngawaka disputed being late to work, attributing lateness to the staff member who relieved him. The last matter covered in the note was Mr Ngawaka’s response to the complaint that he was not wearing his uniform. It was that he was wearing it, but that he had a hoodie underneath his company shirt. [25] The second meeting, on 5 October 2018, was attended by Mr Erasmus, Mr Watson and Mr Ng...

5. UO & NO v HS Ltd & JI & HM [2021] NZDT 1587 (21 July 2021) [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...the supplier before or at the time of making the contract for the supply of the service. 12. This claim relates to building services provided by HS Limited for the new house that was built on the property. As the principal contractor it has the responsibility to ensure the work was done with reasonable skill and care and was fit for purpose. 13. Also, HM, as the previous vendor and a commercial on-seller, had a responsibility to ensure the building was fit for purpose. He arranged...

6. OIA-109319.pdf [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   ...February 2024, the Chief Executive sent a further two emails to staff regarding an organisational restructure . In the interest of transparency, these emails have also been provided to you. Some information has been withheld as being out of scope. In response to the second part of your request, the Ministry recently provided its current FTE count for the 2023 financial year to the Public Service Commission. This information is available on their website here: publicservice.govt.nzlresear...

7. Welsh v Welsh - Taiharuru 4C3D [2024] Chief Judge's MB 1 (2024 CJ 1) [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...matter should referred to the Acting Chief Judge for directions. Ko te hātepe ture o te tono nei Procedural History [4] On 24 May 2023, the Case Manager’s Report and Recommendation was sent to all parties known to the Court. [5] Several responses were received to the Report. Three responses were received from Will McKenzie, counsel for Stanley Welsh Junior. Other responses were also received from Cameron Welsh who stated that he had only recently become aware of the t...

8. 2023-10-11-MTA-Rebuttal-Evidence-of-D-Wilson.pdf [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...the Project going forward. 8. I have read and rely on the evidence of Mrs Dianne Rump and Mrs Siobhan Karaitiana who discuss our requests for appropriate recognition in the CEDF and certainty of cultural mitigation; and appropriate conditions responses respectively. 9. I am not giving this evidence in an expert capacity. However, I have the following qualifications and experience. (a) Three Years in the role of Environmental Manager for Muaūpoko Tribal Authority Incorporate...

9. Lochead-MacMillan v Nimble Financial Services Group Limited [2024] NZHRRT 25 [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...the Privacy Commissioner and initially withheld some of the requested personal information. Mr Lochead-MacMillan claims that NFSG interfered with his privacy by failing to comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act 1993 (the Act)2 in its response to his request. BACKGROUND [3] In late 2017, Mr Lochead-MacMillan engaged NFSG to provide financial services in respect of the purchase of a residential property. After the financial arrangements were finalised, Mr Lochead-MacMi...

10. Evidence-of-M-Warwick.pdf [pdf, 173 KB]

    ...• The submissions made by the Groups • The Resource Management Act (RMA) • Government Policy statement on Land Transport Plan 9. The scope of this statement of evidence does not extend to identifying consequential amendments needed in response to the concerns raised. 10. For ease of administration, this statement of evidence focusses only on areas of remaining concerns. Where I do not specifically address issues raised in the Groups submissions I either agree with or have...