LCRO 119/2021 FE v AD of [Firm 1] (14 October 2022) [pdf, 267 KB]
...that were being made at the time by Mr FE; and (h) he had ceased acting for [XG] from 16 June 2020 and his attendance at the company premises subsequently was for purposes of representing Mr LM in his personal capacity. [14] Mr FE provided a response to Mr AD. In correspondence to the Complaints Service of 21 October 2020, Mr FE submitted that: (a) he had evidence to support his contention that Mr AD had previously acted for him; and (b) the waiver document prepared by Mr AD cl...