Search Results

1. Guide-5-A-Guide-to-Deportation-Appeal-Cancelled-Refugee-and-Protected-Person.pdf [pdf, 371 KB]

   ...Form 5. http://www.iaa.govt.nz/policy-manual/part-a/who.asp http://www.justice.govt.nz/services/legal-help/legal-aid http://www.justice.govt.nz/services/legal-help/legal-aid Page 8 1.8 Can I appeal if I am under 18 years old? Yes, but a responsible adult must act for you during the appeal. The responsible adult should be one of your parents. If this is impossible (for example, if your parents are not in New Zealand), the Tribunal needs to know so it can appoint a responsible adul...

2. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Wintour [2025] NZLCDT 25 (7 May 2025) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...both cases, along with an implied or express threat against the complainant, he exhibited a sense of privilege and entitlement. In the present case, his deceitful conduct in defence showed he was prepared to fabricate material to try to evade responsibility. We find that he obtained the protected material from a Probation Officer on a particular date. We find that is the only occasion he could have come by the material. We find that when he suggested, early on, he had obtained the...

3. [2025] NZIACDT 54 - SC v Wharekura (15 October 2025) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...at [34], citing Roberts v Professional Conduct Committee of the Nursing Council of New Zealand [2012] NZHC 3354 at [44]–[51]; and Katamat v Professional Conduct Committee [2012] NZHC 1633, [2013] NZAR 320 at [49]. 11 Mr Wharekura bears no responsibility for the decline. If he had followed the simple and clear instruction to remove her, it is likely the complainant would have been granted residence (Immigration NZ had not raised any other issues with the application). Responsi...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 230 FIRST Union Inc v Jacks Hardware and Timber Ltd [pdf, 365 KB]

   ...wage rates to both its other employees and competitors in business, as the Bunnings’ wage information appeared to have been disclosed. [30] In December 2013 the Chief Executive Officer of Jacks, Mr Dippie, relinquished his general managerial responsibilities for employment relations to Neil Finn-House. There were some further delays while this change took effect. [31] The first bargaining meeting between the parties was on 31 January 2014. Mr Dippie was present for the prelimina...

5. McKinney v Cassidy [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...was the principal shareholder and director of a company called New Millennium Developments Ltd. This company owned the property and arranged for the design and construction of the dwelling in 1997. It is alleged that Mr Cassidy was the builder responsible for the construction of the house. 2.3 The second respondent is Mr Alarcon, who it is alleged was the person who carried out the plastering to the outside of this house. 2.4 The third respondent is the North Shore City Co...

6. BORA Resource Management Amendment Bill [pdf, 332 KB]

   ...Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects) Act 2012. Explanatory note Resource Management Amendment Bill 3 PCO 21656 v 9.3: 28 August 2019: 2:37 p.m. Enabling Environmental Protection Authority to take enforcement action under RMA Responsibility for enforcement under the RMA generally sits with local government. The Bill empowers the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) to also undertake investigation and enforcement actions under the RMA. This is to enhance accounta-...

7. [2011] NZEmpC 128 McKean v Ports of Auckland Ltd [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...Gibson’s attention. He commenced a disciplinary investigation on the basis set out in a letter to Mr McKean dated 12 September 2011, and required him to attend a meeting on 16 September. Mr McKean was supported at that meeting and provided a written response to the concerns that had been raised and also a set of submissions prepared by his lawyer. Mr Gibson says that he considered the matters raised by and on Mr McKean’s behalf. This included an argument that Mr McKean could not...

8. [2014] NZEmpC 194 Commissioner of Police v Coffey [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...Mr Coffey had signed over the years, the variation contained in the March 2009 letter was different in that "it contained a new IEA (and corresponding CEA) to replace any previous agreement". Counsel also stressed that Mr Coffey was responsible for reading and clarifying any matters in the variation letter and accompanying revised 1999 IEA, and the variation letter encouraged him to seek independent advice on the offer. [33] Mr Churchman noted that the wording in the...

9. [2013] NZEmpC 206 Candyland Ltd v Jarvis [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...Mrs Coker at 3.02 pm to advise that she would be in at work the following day and asked whether she was needed for a 9.00 am or 10.00 am start. Mrs Coker did not immediately reply. Mrs Jarvis resent the text message at 7.17 pm and received a response at 10.01 pm saying: Didn’t expect you back. Rostered Amber and Janine working this week instead. [Mr Jarvis] can come in for bagging if he wants [17] Mrs Jarvis says she was astounded to receive this message and sent a reply adv...

10. [2017] NZEmpC 141 Lewis v Immigration Guru Ltd [pdf, 322 KB]

    ...Factual outline [16] Mrs Lewis was in employment at Rainbow’s End when she expressed interest in the position being offered by the defendant. Originally, the defendant was seeking to recruit a licensed immigration advisor, but due to a lack of response from suitable candidates, the role was changed to that of an administrator with the potential to become a licensed immigration advisor. [17] Mrs Lewis was successful in her application for the administrator role and, as stated...