Search Results

1. [2011] NZCA 14 CA405/2010 Idea Services Ltd v Dickson [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...the service users in the home; and (e) any activity they engage in must not disturb the service users during the night. [16] It was common ground that, throughout the duration of sleepovers, community service workers have certain continuous responsibilities. These include responsibility for the safety and well-being of service users. At the start of each sleepover, they must consult a day book in the home which is an essential means of communication between community service work...

2. E97 Paul Kennedy - Coastal Environment - RE – Applicant [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...description .............................................................................................................. 2 Associated Management Plans ........................................................................................... 2 Responsibilities .................................................................................................................... 2 Project contacts .............................................................................................

3. E35 Peter Kensington - Landscape - EIC - Council [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...the landscape and visual effects assessment of the Application contained in my Report (Assessment of the Application); (c) An update following expert witness conferencing, referring to the Landscape and Urban Design JWSs where appropriate, and a response to the Applicant’s evidence (Update Following Expert Witness Conferencing / Response to Applicant’s Evidence); (d) Comments on draft conditions and proposed mitigation (Conditions / Mitigation); and (e) Conclusions. 6. E...

4. LCRO 163/2020 DM v TN and EX (9 April 2021) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...view as to outcome. [17] If the Committee’s preliminary view is that the complaint appears to lack substance, a Legal Standards Officer (LSO) will contact the respondent lawyer and inform them of the Committee’s preliminary view, inviting a response from the lawyer. [18] Any response is included in a file note, described as a “Call Log”, prepared by the LSO and provided to the Committee, which then completes its inquiry into the complaint. [19] On 14 July 2020, the LSO s...

5. MacGregor v Craig (Limited Extension of Confidentiality Orders) [2016] NZHRRT 30 [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...the benefit of publication in circumstances, as apply here, where Mr Craig intends to repeat large parts of the information already tested before the Tribunal. [26.8] There are other means of protecting fair trial rights. In particular it is the responsibility of the High Court trial judge to manage the trial with that right in mind. The responsibility is that of the trial judge, a responsibility which the Tribunal can safely hand over once the jury is sworn in. Such timing would avoi...

6. INZ (Calder) v Cleland [2019] NZIACDT 25 (3 May 2019) [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...of their business relationships with Mr Porteous and IPS before the relationship with Mr Cleland.1 [8] As noted above, IPS/BNAC sources jobs in New Zealand for Philippine workers with the adviser, in this case Mr Cleland, supposedly then being responsible for providing immigration services. None of the staff of IPS/BNAC are licenced immigration advisers. [9] The complaint concerns 12 clients of Mr Cleland. [10] Each of the clients entered into a written “Client Agreement” wit...

7. LCRO 160/2016 ET v NE (23 May 2019) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...correct, he did not estimate his fee would be $10,000. Mr NE’s position is that he was not aware Mr OC had given Mr ET that misplaced expectation until considerably later on. [39] Mr OC had provided an undertaking on his firm’s behalf that it was responsible for counsel’s fees. [40] Mr NE says: (a) he first received a draft of Mr ET’s supporting affidavit from Mr OC on 27 July 2015. He found that contained material Mr ET had provided to Mr OC much earlier, but Mr OC ha...

8. The Registrar - Te Ahitainga No1 Sec 10 C (2018) 72 Tākitimu MB 255 (72 TKT 255) [pdf, 350 KB]

   ...of income to the beneficial owners or shareholders. The agreement provided that the Te Ahitainga Trust, which is the existing trust as set up by the Māori Land Court, be the administrators for the ensuing six-year lease. They also have specific responsibility for formulating and overseeing the terms of the lease and their fulfilment. There’s a further clause requiring the organisation of a general meeting of administrators biannually, and finally a clause recording that an admin...

9. [2020] NZEnvC 015 Goatley Holdings Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...are consistent with the relevant consent condition(s). The Consent Holder shall include with the submitted management plans details of engagement with iwi for the development of the plans. 67 I l If the Consent Holder does not receive any response from the Council within 20 working days of the management plan being submitted for certification, the Consent Holder will be deemed to have certification and can commence the works, stage or activity. Advice Note: The Council will...

10. Tamakehu v Te Uamairangi - Ohotu No.1C No.1 Block (2020) 414 Aotea MB 59 (414 AOT 59) [pdf, 223 KB]

    ...name Ohotu 1C1 Matahiwi Marae Trustees on 19 July 2012.4 The marae charter [7] The relevant clauses of the marae charter referred to by the applicants provide: 8.1.1 Financial Management/Whakatau Kaupapa Mo Te Putea Trustees are ultimately responsible for all decisions, management and administration pertaining to “The Trust” finances therefore their functions and powers involve the following: • Maintain “Minute Book of Trustees” which records all meetings, resoluti...