Search Results

1. BORA - APEC 2021 Bill [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...considers is directly affected more than the public generally. There is no obligation to consult anyone else. No consultation is required for a constable to close a place at cl 52. This is because cl 52 is designed to only be used reactively, in response to security situations that develop during the leaders’ event period. Closure of roads, marine areas, and the creation of secure transport routes 17. Roads and marine areas—cls 50 and 51 respectively—may be closed in whole or in...

2. Kidd v Maori Owners - Whenuanui No 2B [2021] Chief Judges MB 1409 (2021 CJ 1409) [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...order. 7 2021 Chief Judge’s MB 1189-1211 (2021 CJ 1189-1211) at 1199. 8 Above n 7. 9 2021 Chief Judge’s MB 1189-1211 (2021 CJ 1189-1211) at 1208. 2021 Chief Judge’s MB 1420 [23] Counsel also submits that the Court cannot be held responsible for the lack of notice, as it was a result of the applicants’ failure and the failure of executors of Mr McCown’s estate to provide notice to the Court and apply for confirmation of the transfers of their shares in the la...

3. [2021] NZEmpC 120 Lye v ISO Ltd [pdf, 285 KB]

   ...concluded that the orders sought were related to the bargaining but fell short of asking to have new terms and conditions of employment fixed.13 [14] However, the application for a compliance order was declined. The Authority accepted ISO’s response that it had not applied the terms of the employment agreement requiring the employee’s availability. Mr Seymour was allowed to accept or reject work on a weekly basis without justifying his decision.14 That conclusion meant the A...

4. Bamber v Official Assignee - Lot 39 DPS 3455 [2022] Chief Judge's MB 664 (2022 CJ 664) [pdf, 359 KB]

   ...Te Ngaru; e) Kathleen Bamber’s Email exchange with IRD re: Māori Trust dated 12 October 2015 and 24 September 2015; f) Notice of General Meeting of Owners of Tahorakuri A1 33A2 Trust dated 16 September 2020; g) Kathy Bamber’s email response dated 9 October 2020 re: Tahorakuri A1 33A/2 Trust owner’s meeting; and h) Whakamaru Maungaiti M3/2 minute dated 9 July 2018. 2 238 Waiariki MB 196-205 (238 WAR 196-205) at 204. 2022 Chief Judge's MB 667 8....

5. IPT Practice Note 4/2023 Deportation Non-Resident [pdf, 384 KB]

   ...it was sent (if sent by registered letter or courier to an address outside New Zealand) — section 386A(4) and (5). [3.3] The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to accept an appeal out of time. The Tribunal’s administrative staff are not responsible for calculating the time for lodgement of an appeal for intending appellants. Intending appellants are responsible for making any such calculation for themselves. Any intending appellant should consult section 6 of the Act, whi...

6. LCRO 117/2022 VN v SC (16 May 2024) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...provision of clinical notes and x- rays of alleged work. Some of the work could be covered by ACC and therefore they need to prove that work was actually paid for. [16] The respondent forwarded this email to Mr DS and Ms WT stating: My clients response – his points appear valid. We don’t even have the names of the patients. [17] The applicant said that Company B subsequently lodged two claims in the [Tribunal], one against Company A regarding the treatment of the retention fund...

7. NZCVS 2023 Cycle 6 Sexual violence and family offences [xlsx, 86 KB]

   ...other hand, when the confidence intervals of two estimates do overlap, the difference between the estimates is described as not statistically significant. This is a more conservative approach than a formal statistical test. Don't know/refusal responses Residual response categories such as "don't know" and "don't wish to answer" are generally excluded from analysis. This is generally the case for analysis of victimisation and rates of reporting victimisations...

8. Turkmani v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2024] NZACC 127 (24 July 2024) [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...outside its authority under the Act. [39] In Sinclair,2 Dobson J stated: [26] I am not satisfied that the adoption of a generous approach to what might constitute the lodging of a claim for cover can focus upon the nature of the Corporation’s responses to an initiative by a claimant. Conceptually, the adequacy of what is submitted as a claim may, in some circumstances, be influenced by the nature of the Corporation’s response to it. However, that does not justify an approach...

9. LCRO 130/2022 FN v EO (31 October 2023) [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...unsuccessful)” and only found out that Mr FN had left the firm when she made contact in March. [25] Ms EO also complained about Mr TX who had declined to reduce the fees charged by Mr FN. [26] Ms EO says that from the information received in response to a Privacy Act request, she could only ascertain that the work completed was the preparation and service of the statutory demand. [27] She sought a “fair and reasonable adjustment of the fee”. Mr FN’ response [28...

10. [2023] NZEmpC 227 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [pdf, 280 KB]

    ...The facts [20] In this case the documentation is helpful, most particularly What We Believe. This document is of central importance within the Gloriavale Community and clearly states that it is the Overseeing Shepherd who has the authority and responsibility to 10 Compare, for example Colosimo v Parker (2007) 8 NZELC 98,622 (EmpC) at [25]. 11 Employment Relations Act 2000, s 189. make all appointments to fill positions of responsibility.12 What We Believe also makes i...