Search Results

1. Lomu v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 95 (01 October 2014) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...complainant and the Registrar have elected not to apply for costs of investigation or representation. Given Ms Tangilanu’s claimed inability to meet any such order, the approach is not surprising. [33] Ms Tangilanu has generally resisted admitting responsibility for the complaints, and the Tribunal has incurred the cost of dealing with them. However, there would be an element of futility in making an order for the costs of the hearings and I will accordingly not make such an order. [...

2. Finau v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 96 (01 October 2014) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...Authority [4] The Authority did not make any submissions on sanctions. The Complainant [5] The complainant did not make any submissions on sanctions. Ms Tangilanu [6] Ms Tangilanu provided submissions on sanctions. They appear to be a generic response for this and 11 other complaints on which the Tribunal is imposing sanctions. The submission is difficult to understand. The material points appear to be that: [6.1] The publicity resulting from her professional offending has had an...

3. A & T Kaufusi v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 98 (01 October 2014) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...The Complainants [5] The complainants did not make any submissions on sanctions. Ms Tangilanu [6] Ms Tangilanu provided submissions on sanctions. She did not challenge the orders sought by the complainant. The submissions appear to be a generic response to this and the 11 other complaints currently before the Tribunal. The submission is difficult to understand. The material points appear to be that: [6.1] The publicity resulting from her professional offending has had an adverse eff...

4. Ngalu v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 102 (01 October 2014) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...Authority [4] The Authority did not make any submissions on sanctions. The Complainant [5] The complainant did not make any submissions on sanctions. Ms Tangilanu [6] Ms Tangilanu provided submissions on sanctions. It appears it is a generic response for this and the 11 other complaints on which the Tribunal is imposing sanctions. The submission is difficult to understand. The material points appear to be that: [6.1] The publicity resulting from her professional offending has had...

5. Thoman v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 81 (15 September 2014) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...discussed. [33] The Registrar has elected not to apply for costs of investigation, and representation at the hearing. Given Ms Devi’s alleged inability to meet any order, the approach is not surprising. [34] Ms Devi has generally resisted admitting responsibility for the complaints and the Tribunal has incurred the cost of dealing with them. However, there would be an element of futility in making an order for the costs of the hearings and I will accordingly not make such an order. [...

6. Prasad v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 88 (15 September 2014) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...discussed. [33] The Registrar has elected not to apply for costs of investigation, and representation at the hearing. Given Ms Devi’s alleged inability to meet any order, the approach is not surprising. [34] Ms Devi has generally resisted admitting responsibility for the complaints and the Tribunal has incurred the cost of dealing with them. However, there would be an element of futility in making an order for the costs of the hearings and I will accordingly not make such an order. [...

7. Karepa v Te Riini - Kikorangi Kareti Karepa Whanau Trust (2016) 144 Waiariki MB 3 (144 WAR 3) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...a direction giving the applicants three weeks to file submissions in reply. Mr Riikau Karepa acknowledged receipt of the respondents’ submissions, as well as the Court’s directions. However, by the due date, the applicants had provided no response to the respondents’ submissions on costs. Respondents’ submissions [3] Counsel for the respondents argued that an award of costs were appropriate in this case for the following reasons: (a) the Court “comprehensively dis...

8. Nguyen v Hu [2016] NZIACDT 24 (16 May 2016) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...grounds of complaint were wider; the complainant has not filed a statement of reply seeking to pursue the wider grounds of complaint. Accordingly, the Tribunal will only consider the grounds the Registrar considered to have potential support. The responses [6] The complainant did not file a statement of reply, and was not required to do so if he agreed with the contents of the Statement of Complaint. [7] Mr Hu did file a statement of reply; he took issue with the facts on which the com...

9. Trustees of Wi Pere Trust - Wi PereTrust Estate (2003) 156 Gisborne MB 127 (156 GIS 127) [pdf, 418 KB]

   ...GIS 130 He also cited the Te Whanau-A-Taupara Trust Empowering Act 2003 (Private Act 2003 No 2). That Act enables the trustees of that Trust to be paid an emolument for their services as may be fair and reasonable having regard to their duties and responsibilities as trustees. The amount is approved by annual resolution of the trustees and the amount approved is reported in the Trust's annual accounts. The Trustees hold office for a term of three years. This Act, he argued, reflects...

10. LCRO 277/2016 CH v DS (7 March 2019) [pdf, 175 KB]

    ...being “tantamount to [him] making an admission that [his] behaviour need[ed] to be changed”. He considered this would prejudice him in court proceedings which he intended to file. [5] CH extended the grounds of his complaint following DS’s response to the complaint. By that time DS had made the proposal referred to in [3] above. CH’s additional complaint was that the Protection Order was being used to extract agreement to the property relationship issues. He said: A ...