Search Results

Search results for response.

15736 items matching your search terms

  1. [2025] NZIACDT 44 – SC v Wharekura (28 August 2025) [pdf, 284 KB]

    ...or stable. The complainant was advised these issues might mean the application would be declined. He could make comments or send further information. [12] On 30 June 2023, Immigration NZ sent an email to the agency advising there had been no response to the letter of 12 June. This might result in a negative outcome for the complainant. [13] On 13 July 2023, Mr Wharekura sent an email to the complainant listing documents to be given to him. While not stated in the email, thes...

  2. Research on the effectiveness of police practice in reducing residential burglary part 5: case study of Rotorua Local Police Area [pdf, 454 KB]

    ...survey and pamphlet drop alerting residents about security issues. Property-focused initiatives Liaison with second-hand dealers was regarded by Rotorua Police as an important part of the strategy to reduce burglary. Members of the LET had the main responsibility for liaison, checking for stolen property, reminding dealers of their responsibilities and providing them with lists of known offenders. The liaison was said to work best when one person was responsible but this was not consistent...

  3. AML/CFT Statutory Review - summary of submissions [pdf, 1.2 MB]

    ...whether the Act or the regime should be utilised to support the implementation of targeted financial sanctions to combat terrorism financing and proliferation financing. We asked whether this should form a purpose of the Act, which agency should be responsible for supervision, and whether there needed to be supplementary obligations imposed by the Act to support businesses with their existing obligations. Including targeted financial sanctions as a purpose of the Act 16. This section...

  4. [2010] NZEmpC 140 Weston v Advkit Para Legal Services Ltd [pdf, 49 KB]

    ...blameworthy conduct. [46] Although I accept Mrs Weston’s evidence that she was stressed as a result of Kirk’s assault, I do find there was an element of blameworthiness in her conduct which directly led to Mr Dixon-McIver’s inappropriate response that induced her resignation. I therefore find that there is an element of contribution which should reduce the remedies that I would otherwise have awarded, but, in view of the distress that had been induced by Kirk’s assault, I...

  5. [2009] NZEmpC CC 8/09 Safe Air Ltd v Walker [pdf, 56 KB]

    ...clear that the management of the company was not aware of and did not in any way approve of the culture that you claim exists. The company has responded at different levels of the organization according to the seriousness of the activity and the responsibility level of the people involved. At your level you have exhibited extremely high volumes of inappropriate email activity, and in particular a relatively large number of extremely serious emails including the Sex Statistics email with...

  6. [2013] NZEmpC 24 Idea services Ltd v Barker [pdf, 120 KB]

    ...it clear that no cross challenge would be made. She is, clearly, bound by the conduct of her case. There is no injustice in that. [30] In the concluding section of his submissions, Mr Taylor stated: 62. In short, the applicant must accept responsibility for the conduct of her case by an experienced advocate. If she has a problem with the way her case was conducted her remedy, if any, is against the representative she employed (see Parker v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [2009] ERNZ...

  7. Henton v CAC302 & Barfoot & Thompson Ltd [2015] NZREADT 70 [pdf, 243 KB]

    ...matter raised, the licensee points to the Tribunal decision which it says deals with the matter of the handling of the complaint by the licensee. The licensee states that this matter is res judicata, because the Tribunal stated that the licensee’s response to the complainant’s concern was not unreasonable in all the circumstances. The licensee believes that this matter has been dealt with and should not be raised again.” [2] Also by way of background, we set out the reasons whic...

  8. The Māori Trustee v O'Rorke - Pukekohatu 7B (2014) 329 Aotea MB 79 (329 AOT 79) [pdf, 308 KB]

    ...Pukekohatu 6A, 6B &7B ahu whenua trust by removing Pukekohatu7B block from that trust, an order under s 215 of the Act constituting an ahu whenua trust over Pukekohatu 7B only, and orders under s 222 of the Act appointing the Māori Trustee as responsible trustee and three advisory trustees. [4] The parties have been unable to agree terms of trust. This decision deals with the three outstanding issues in relation to the proposed terms, namely: (a) What are the parties...

  9. Te Ohu Kaimoana Trustee Ltd v Ngāti Maru (Taranaki) Fisheries Trust - Ngāti Maru (Taranaki) Fisheries Trust (2015) 341 Aotea MB 211 (341 AOT 211) [pdf, 254 KB]

    ...trust. Once TOKM became aware of those issues they were obliged to ensure compliance with the 2004 Act. To that extent, TOKM gave the trustees of the Fisheries Trust time to respond to the issues raised by the beneficiary but received inadequate responses. Consequently TOKM now seeks orders from the Court. 5 335 AOT 47 (335 AOT 47) 6 336 AOT 196 (336 AOT 196) 7 337 AOT 109 (337 AOT 109) 8 2015 Chief Judge’s MB...

  10. [2015] NZEmpC 201 Owen v CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 174 KB]

    ...the investigation with the same Authority Member would not afford Ms Owen her right to a de novo hearing, and was contrary to “the direction” of Judge Perkins, as well as Ms Owen’s rights to natural justice. [12] In her memorandum in response, Ms Sewell pointed out that Judge Perkins had made it clear that he intended that the investigation would “continue”; and had not stated that the investigation meeting should be a “hearing de novo before a new Authority Member...