Search Results

1. B Ltd v R Ltd [2024] NZDT 169 (17 April 2024) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...was not fit for purpose after its work by R Ltd. Was there an opportunity provided for any failure to be remedied and was this required within a reasonable time? Did the respondent remedy any failure? 15. SD acknowledged that R Ltd accepted responsibility for the vehicle and collected it for repair after the initial rebuild. However, when the issue was raised with R Ltd again the second time, he said R Ltd told him the vehicle was outside the 12-month warranty period and they wou...

2. 2023-09-26-SOE_Stuart-Farrant_Stormwater.pdf [pdf, 237 KB]

   ........................................................................................... 3 Stormwater Design ........................................................................................ 3 Operations and maintenance plans ............................................................... 6 E. RESPONSE TO SECTION 274 PARTY EVIDENCE .................................................... 8 F. CONDITIONS ....................................................................................

3. OIA-106597.pdf [pdf, 899 KB]

   ...limit to make a decision on your request to 8 September 2023. The extension was required so that we could consult with the Office of the Chief Coroner. Following this consultation, I am now pleased to provide you with a decision on your request. Response In response to your request, please find Table 1 enclosed which provides you with the number of post-mortem directions, broken down by financial year, direction type and ethnicity of the deceased. These numbers relate to coronial cases...

4. [2025] NZIACDT 50 - NF v Wilson (22 September 2025) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...agency suggested he apply for a new balance of four years. She would waive her fee. The complainant replied the same day agreeing to her solution. She responded on 17 January to say the application could be made at any time, adding she had taken responsibility which was why she had waived her service fee. This prompted the complainant on 7 February to express disappointment with her service. He did not want to go through another process with her, preferring a refund instead. He had...

5. Central Standards Committee 3 v Mr P [2025] NZLCDT 37 (1 August 2025) [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...description) an Interim Restraining Order had been made in respect of the children named in it. He explained that he was expecting the documents within the next 20-30 minutes - which would have met the filing deadline. [24] Mr P received a prompt response from the Court (2.12 pm) to the effect that there was no OT file for those children in the Court’s system. In reply, Mr P mused that perhaps there was just an intention to file by OT. [25] Mr P also considered that there could...

6. Procceds of Crime Fund Proposal Template November 2025 [docx, 136 KB]

   ...https://www.justice.govt.nz/justice-sector-policy/about-the-justice-sector/proceeds-of-crime-fund/ Eligible agencies may choose to partner with another eligible agencies, community groups or non-eligible agencies as part of their proposals. In choosing to apply, the eligible agency takes on the roles and responsibilities of the Lead Agency as outlined in the Fund’s Terms of Reference. These can be found on the Proceeds of Crime Fund website and are summarised at the end of this proposal temp...

7. Auckland Standards Committee 5 v Yoo [2016] NZLCDT 35 [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...larger. But there was no dishonesty involved in the failures by Mr Yoo, and no losses were suffered by clients. [4] In addition to that we note by way of general background that the response of the practitioner in rectification and acceptance of responsibility, has led to him setting matters in order and we will refer more specifically to that under the discussion of “mitigation”. [5] We record, as has been said many times, that the purposes of penalty in the disciplinary ju...

8. ENVC Matiatia direction re 30 Jan application 20150202 [pdf, 486 KB]

   ...with its application as notified ( and withdraw its proposed amendment), or withdraw the marina application altogether. 1 4. Fairness to all parties dictates that the Court make this Direction, and it does so. WML is required to file and serve its response by 9 February 2015. 5. Should WML elect to proceed with the marina application as amended in documents lodged in Court on 15 December, steps (b) (c) and (d) in Paragraph 4 of the Court's24 December Minute are extended by one week...

9. Yang 10 October 2017 NZSHD 6 [pdf, 70 KB]

   ...the last five years. Specified offence is defined in s 4 of the Act and includes any offence under ss 217 to 265 of the Crimes Act 1961. [3] Mr Yang was sent a copy of the Police complaint on 29 August 2017 and advised he had two weeks to file a response or request a hearing on the complaint. At the end of two weeks he asked if he could have further time and was advised he could have a further week but if more time was needed he would need to file a formal request. He has not sought a...

10. 2021-05-12 Fish & Game - MOC - supplementary evidence [pdf, 130 KB]

    ...maree.baker-galloway@al.nz | roisin.giles@al.nz 2101895 | 6006546v1 page 1 May it please the Court 1 This Memorandum of Counsel is filed on behalf of the Otago Fish and Game Council and the Central South Island Fish and Game Council in response to the Court's direction that Mr Farrell file any supplementary evidence in response to the Joint Witness Statement three working days prior to the resumption of Fish and Game's case. 2 Fish and Game appreciate the op...