Search Results

1. [2020] NZREADT 37 - Eade v Real Estate Agents Authority (25 August 2020) [pdf, 335 KB]

   ...make, once established. As a result, [Mr Quinton] and the Agency were no better informed than the [appellants] with regard to progress and changes concerning the specific matters they have complained about. f) There was no legal or professional responsibility on the part of [Mr Quinton] and the Agency to keep the [appellants] abreast of progress with the [Hereford] developments from date of ASP to settlement. g) The [appellants] do not identify any parts of the ASP as having been...

2. M and M v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2019] CEIT-2019-0047 [pdf, 329 KB]

   ...need to be re-set. [34] Because the life of a skylight is far greater than the length of the guarantee, there is a risk that the weather tightness of the skylights might fail outside the guarantee period. [35] Finally, there is a risk of divided responsibility for a weather tightness failure. There is no escaping the division of responsibility between the supplier and the installer, but the problem becomes significantly worse if some elements in the roofing system have been replaced...

3. Randall v Moeahu - Lot 1 Deposited Plan 442626 (2018) 390 Aotea MB 4 (390 AOT 4) [pdf, 369 KB]

   ...obligations of the Trust. The proceedings – report from trustees [6] Following a judicial conference in March 2018, I issued directions in May requiring the Trustees to appear and report. A good deal of additional information was filed in response. I also issued a summons the chair of the Te Aroha Hutt Valley Sports Association (“the Association”) to attend the hearing and produce evidence concerning the relationship of the Association with the Marae and the Company. It wa...

4. NZCVS topical report - Offences against New Zealand adults by family members (data tables) [xlsx, 121 KB]

   ...composition Two samples were drawn as part of the NZCVS: a general or ‘main’ sample and a Māori booster sample that aimed to increase sample size for Māori. Sample size A total of 8,030 people responded as part of the NZCVS in 2018. This includes 5,273 responses as part of the main sample and 2,757 for the Māori booster sample. Interviewing period 1 March 2018 – 7 October 2018 Response rate The overall response rate was 81%. The response rate for the main sample was 81% and for...

5. [2022] NZEnvC 082 Ormiston Workshops Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 571 KB]

   ...collection, water supply and stormwater treatment/disposal], which are located within Lot 100. To ensure that Lots 1 to 29 (inclusive) remain adequately serviced and connected, an Incorporated Society must be created by the consent holder to own, and be responsible and liable for the ongoing operation, maintenance and repair of the common assets within Lot 100. The following requirements must be met in order to satisfy this condition: a) Ownership of the common assets [vehicle acc...

6. LCRO 153/2022 YA v CK (16 July 2024) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...setbacks I’ve been faced with over recent years. … In addition I would like to ask for $20,000 for KD’s university fees and orthodontic work that she desperately needs to have done. [31] Ms YA sent the draft letter to Mr CK for his approval, in response to which he confirmed that the draft was ‘fine as a letter from [her]’.9 [32] In the course of preparing the letter, Ms YA asked Mr CK to estimate his costs so that she could include that in her letter. Mr CK advised that h...

7. Aitcheson v Accident Compensation Corporation (Social Rehabilitation, Attendant care, Laundry Services) [2023] NZACC 143 [pdf, 389 KB]

   ...that there was no evidence of any improvement in his functional status, or any reduction in the persistent presence of overt behaviours that could indicate a safe reduction from level 2 to level 1 care. [10] On 21 April 2014, Ms Bay provided a response to Ms Mather’s November report. She disagreed that there was enough evidence to support the continuation of level 2 funded carer support. [11] On 24 September 2014, Ms Mather provided a further report. She concluded that Mr Mart...

8. 2023-09-26-SOE_Mark-St-Clair_Planning.pdf [pdf, 337 KB]

   ............................................. 20 Hydrology and flooding ................................................................................ 20 Other matters............................................................................................... 22 G. RESPONSE TO SECTION 274 PARTY EVIDENCE .................................................. 24 H. CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................... 24 I. CONCL...

9. Jones v Accident Compensation Corporation [2025] NZHRRT 25 [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...and F Becroft for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 3 and 4 February 2025 DATE OF DECISION: 23 July 2025 2 [2] Mr Jones disputed the amount of the weekly compensation he received from ACC and sought access to his ACC claim files. In response, ACC informed Mr Jones that one of his claim files has been destroyed but provided him with access to his other claim file. [3] Mr Jones alleges that ACC has also destroyed or lost documents in the claim file he was provided, an al...

10. LCRO 167/2023 UG v XY and EP (17 July 2025) [pdf, 255 KB]

    ...properties owned by her, or entities associated with her. None of them recorded an ownership interest held by Mr QH. 1 Letter XY to Ms UG (7 February 2023) at [4]. This statement differs from XY’s letter to Ms UG dated 20 December 2022 and the response to the complaint by EP and XY to the Lawyers Complaints Service by letter dated 21 April 2023 at [3]. 2 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008. 3 [12] On 16 November 2022, Ms UG received...