SV v WT LCRO 21/2013 (26 August 2014) [pdf, 110 KB]
...he was Mr GN’s instructing solicitor, he now says he agrees with Mr SV, when he says he was not Mr WT’s client in the matters to which the invoice relates. [3] Mr WT describes Mr GN as the “scoundrel” in the case, and attributes all responsibility for his actions to Mr GN. Mr WT says that to the best of his recollection, it is most likely that Mr GN generated the invoice, put it before him, told him he was acting as Mr GN’s instructing solicitor, and asked him to sign it...