Search Results

1. Joint Witness Statement Noise and Vibration 25 July 2018 [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   ...lding on ....... Comment ed [N&V7]: 19 July 2018 mediation agreement; Princes Wharf is restricted to between the hours of 7am and 7pm, unless the Counci l noise and vibration item 2: The experts consider th is to be an - . appropriate professional response. certifies that impact piling outside of these hours is consistent with the BPO. m) A !section requiring that impact piling and concrete culling may only be undertaken during the daytime periods defined in Condition 109. 110A. I...

2. 2021-05-11 ORC PC7 draft site visit itinerary - Final (updated 11.5.21) [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...Scheme which can be viewed from the roadside and may be a suitable location; however, we suggest the court make a call after hearing from a number of Bannockburn parties on 12 May. Mr E Parcell provided comments on the draft itinerary. In response, we note the court will undertake a site visit on the morning of 13 May, rather than on 14 May as initially indicated. Details TBC. Visit 9 Site General Location Comment Recommendation Dairy Creek / Lookout B...

3. Suresh v Elizabeth [2019] NZIACDT 30 (10 May 2019) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...160. The complainant was accordingly no longer eligible for automatic selection. [15] On 12 October 2016, the complainant sent an email to an employee asking for the direct number of the manager and the complaints department. As he received no response, he sent a reminder email the following day. 4 [16] A telephone discussion between the complainant and an employee must have taken place since on 15 October 2016, an employee sent an email to the complainant referencing the co...

4. LCRO 103/2020 ZA - Application for review of a prosecutorial decision (24 August 2020) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...Client Care) Rules 2008 (the Rules), in that the statement appeared to have purpose of enabling [YBL] to avoid meeting its obligations to the Inland Revenue Department to pay GST and income tax. [21] Mr ZA was advised of his right to provide a response to the Committee. [22] He did so in correspondence to the Law Society Complaints Service of 2 July 2019. [23] In that response, Mr ZA submitted that: (a) there had been no attempt or intention to encourage Mr and Mrs XC to evade t...

5. [2019] NZREADT 37 - Tafilipepe - penalty [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...trust and have faith in licensees to act with honesty and integrity on real estate transactions. [14] Mr Hodge accepted that Ms Tafilipepe’s dishonesty was not an instance of lying for financial gain, or planned deception, but rather a panicked response to Ms Cokojic’s raising an issue about Mr S. However, he submitted, Ms Tafilipepe’s conduct during the proceedings demonstrated that she had limited insight into her conduct: she contended at the hearing of the charges that...

6. [2019] NZEnvC 074 Hanoi Vietnam Cafe v City Rail Link Limited [pdf, 6.5 MB]

   ...continued throughout this case to claim to oppose the change in Unitary Plan reference number given to the CRL designations, from 1714 to 2500. [25] CRLL and the Council were at pains to explain the practical and legal processes for transfer of responsibility as requiring authority from Auckland Transport to CRLL, with the consequent change in the numbering system within the Unitary Plan. CRLL became a requiring authority from 10 August 2017, taking over responsibility for CRL from...

7. LCRO 64/2020 - QR - Application for review of a prosecutorial decision (7 September 2020) [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...QR to “make a written explanation in relation to the issues of concern identified in Mr NB’s letter”. Mr QR responded2 in some detail to the issues raised in Mr NB’s report and provided copies of a number of documents in support of his response to the issues raised. [11] He concluded his letter with allegations that “Mr NB had predetermined the matter without seeking any reasonable explanation” and that the Committee also was biased against him to the extent that its...

8. Chief Coroners Annual Report 2018-2019 [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...Zealand Legal Information Institute (NZLII) website at nzlii.org. In some cases, such as suicide deaths, publication restrictions prevent the publication of the recommendations. The following are some of the recommendations or comments made and responses received by coroners during the financial year. File Ref: CSU-2015-CCH-000286 2019 NZCorC 16 07/05/2019 Date of Finding: 7 May 2019 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Kaye Marie Blance of Westport died on 3 May 2015 at 877...

9. LCRO 58/2018 QD v FZ (12 October 2018) [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...my position to appear for him. 8. On 12th January 2017 I informed Legal Aid that I may consider withdrawing from the case. 9. On the 26th January 2017 at the Call Over [WD] appeared but the defendant did not appear. She tried his phone but no response. 10. On 1st February 2017 [WD] helped him get his WTA cancelled. He then told [WD] he knows the legal system well and he knows how to complain to the Judge in open court and embarrass me and ensure that I cannot practice as a Lawyer!....

10. Establishing a Criminal Cases Review Commission - Redacted [pdf, 298 KB]

    ...about whether an application has sufficient merit that an appeal court should reconsider the person’s conviction or sentence. 15. Consistent with the separation of powers, CCRCs do not determine guilt or innocence. Determinations of criminal responsibility, including any decision to quash a conviction or order a new trial, remain with the appeal courts. The CCRC’s role is complete at the time it refers a case to the courts. When a case is referred back, it is dealt with as an appea...