Search Results

1. Cao v Tony Tay and Associates Ltd (in liq) [2010] NZWHT Auckland 26 [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...evidence as an expert for Mr Newth. Whilst carrying out a visual inspection he did not primarily give evidence on the defects but largely addressed the defects as identified by Mr Powell. His evidence was mainly on issues concerning the potential responsibility or liability of Mr Newth and the Council for the defects. Mr Flay also gave evidence on behalf of the Council on its responsibility and on whether the alleged defects were acceptable and/or should have been detected by a...

2. Findlay v Auckland City Council [pdf, 108 KB]

   ..................................................................................83 iii. Fascia ................................................................................................84 iv. Aluminium joinery ..............................................................................88 MR SLATER’S RESPONSIBILITY - CONCLUSION................................................95 POSITION OF MR FINDLAY........................................................................98 CONT...

3. Supplementary Government Response to Law Commissions report [pdf, 479 KB]

   Supplementary Government Response to Law Commission report on Review of the Privacy Act 1993 Presented to the House of Representatives 2 Supplementary Government response to Law Commission report on Review of the Privacy Act 1993 Introduction The Government has considered the Law Commission’s report Review of the Privacy Act 1993 (NZLC 123) tabled in the House of Representative...

4. [2022] NZACC 142 – Meisner v ACC (20 July 2022) [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...agreement as to costs and discontinuance of the appeal, or the need for the Court to make a decision as to costs, is 4 April 2022. [5] On 5 April 2022, the Registry asked Mr Wood (cc Mr Gee) for an update on the notice of discontinuance. No response was received. [6] On 27 April 2022, the Registry asked Mr Wood (cc Mr Gee) for an update on the appeal. No response was received. [7] On 9 May 2022, the Registry asked Mr Wood (cc Mr Gee) for an update on the appeal. No response w...

5. OIA-120710.pdf [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), relating to the Proceeds of Crime Fund (the Fund). On 26 March 2025, your request was transferred in part under section 14 of the Act by the Police, to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry), for response. The part of your request transferred to the Ministry is as follows: I request revenue earned from the proceeds of crime fund for each year since its establishment. Before responding to your request, it is important for me to n...

6. OIA-123110.pdf [pdf, 736 KB]

   ...five years, broken down by type of report and type of legal aid (civil, criminal, family). Again, please let me know if it is more administratively feasible to restrict this to, say, the last two years. Your request has been forwarded to me for a response, as it falls within my responsibilities as Legal Services Commissioner and is being managed in accordance with the provisions of the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act). Please refer to the attached excel spreadsheet which is be...

7. De Malmanche & Ors as Trustees of the Lynette De Malmanche Trust v Auckland Council (successor to the Auckland City Council) [2010] NZWHT Auckland 38 [pdf, 392 KB]

   ...this defect, Mr O‘Hagan‘s concern noted in the report (‗cracks visible could have occurred in other locations‘) appears to reflect the assessor‘s report that the sheet set-out was not in accordance with the manual. [38] In his response to Mr Hubbuck‘s evidence, Mr O‘Hagan stated that Fig 12 on page 10 of the James Hardie July 1998 manual specifically shows that unless they are control joints, sheets should not be joined under the corner of openings. He stated...

8. BORA Regulatory Responsibility Bill [pdf, 364 KB]

   Regulatory Responsibility Bill 21 August 2006 Attorney-General LEGAL ADVICE CONSISTENCY WITH THE NEW ZEALAND BILL OF RIGHTS ACT 1990: REGULATORY RESPONSIBILITY BILL 1. We have considered the Regulatory Responsibility Bill (‘the Bill’) for consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (‘the Bill of Rights Act’). The Bill, a Member’s Bill in the name of Rodney Hide MP, was introduced into the House of Representatives on 3 August 2006 and is currently awaiting it...

9. OIA-105424.pdf [pdf, 409 KB]

   ...them reach the trial stage. 2. How many of the disposed cases that reach the trial stage have a guilty verdict. 3. Of the disposed cases that have a guilty verdict how many have a sentence type of imprisonment. I would like to acknowledge that this response is late, and out of the original timeframe. I apologise for this delay and any inconvenience this may have caused you. On the 2 August 2023, the Ministry contacted you to acknowledge this delay and advise that a response was being pr...

10. OIA-Wall Walk [pdf, 2.9 MB]

    ...On 23 September 2024, the Ministry contacted you to clarify parts 7, 8 and 9 of your request under section 15 of the Act. On the same day, you confirmed that you were happy to receive information that is available on the Ministry’s intranet in response to parts 7 and 8 of your request. You also agreed to withdraw part 9 of your request. S9(2)(a) S9(2)(a) S9(2)(a) On 4 October 2024, the Ministry advised that under section 15(1) of the Act the Ministry had decided to grant y...