CM v JD & Ors LCRO 006/2013 (10 March 2016) [pdf, 59 KB]
...registered valuation. In addition, Mr CM pointed out that the valuation of the [City A] property was a GST inclusive figure, and that when making the advance no account had been taken of the fact that “the property is subject to GST”. This was in response to Mr CM’s requests for payments to be made as capital rather than interest. 5 The Standards Committee determination He took the view that the value of the property that should have been applied was the value net of GS...