Lipschitz v Auckland City Council [pdf, 13 KB]
...Respondents 1.1 The fourth respondent, Martin Kenneth Kells and the fifth respondent, Craig William Kells, have filed applications to be removed as parties to the claim. 1.2 The first respondent, Auckland City Council have filed an opposition in response to the fourth and fifth respondents’ applications for removal. 1.3 The applications by the fourth and fifth respondents is based on the ten year “long- stop” limitation period, which is imposed by section 393(2) of the B...