Search Results

1. Director of Proceedings v Campbell [2015] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 574 KB]

   ...responsibilities “must involve a three way discussion between the specialist, the Lead Maternity Carer and the woman concerned. This should include discussion on any need for and timing of specialist review. The specialist will not automatically assume responsibility for on-going care. This will depend on the clinical situation and the wishes of the individual woman.” 47. On reflection, Ms Campbell accepts it was her responsibility to ensure that care had handed over on ar...

2. TE v Wellington Standards Committee LCRO 100/2010, 92/2011, 153/2012 (1 February 2013) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...determination dated 2 March 2011 [10] The Standards Committee issued its determination concerning TE’s conduct on 22 March 2011. That determination addressed the matters raised by NT in her submissions dated 23 August 2010 which she had provided in response to the Notice 3 of Hearing issued on 12 August 2010. These submissions were received by the Complaints Service on 27 August 2010 (although the determination refers to the letter as being dated 27 August 2010)....

3. TG v NP LCRO 190 / 2011 (1 February 2013) [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...with TG. This in turn followed what could be described as a confrontation between TG and the junior barrister, for which TG subsequently apologised. [39] From the outset of his instructions to NP, TG had made it clear that he considered TI was responsible for his costs by reason of her obligations under the Consumer Guarantees Act. He referred NP’s first account to TI for payment, who subsequently advised that she did not intend to pay NP’s bills. [40] At the time NP wrote h...

4. [2017] NZEnvC 212 T Barrett v Thames Coromandel District Council [pdf, 5.8 MB]

   ...which is annexed hereto and marked A. It attempted to understand the various positions of the parties and sought to move the matter towards resolution. A further memorandum has been received from the Council, a reply from Mr Barrett, and a further response from the Council. [2] Mr Barrett's explanations do not assist in understanding the nature of the remaining concerns, however he was required to give provisions and provided a plan. He also provided changed wording to the Paua...

5. Tamati v Wainohu - Tamati Whanau Trust (2010) 5 Tairawhiti MB 87 (5 TRW 87) [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...sort out every act concerning your block of land, your tiny little block of land, to try and reach an outcome. ...” [35] John said he had seen the Court’s pamphlet on the role of trustees of whanau trusts, and has adhered to those duties and responsibilities, promoting the health and wellbeing of the whanau. [36] In response to Mr Harman’s (counsel for the applicant) contention that beneficiaries were not being suitably informed about the trust’s activities, John emphasise...

6. Te Rongomau v Nikau - Whangape Parish Lot 23B (Horahora Marae) (2011) 23 Waikato Maniapoto MB 3 (23 WMN 3) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...loss and is suffering significant intangible loss in terms of its wairua and reputation. The other trustees in office at the time of the wharenui building contract have accepted that the situation that arose for the marae was to some degree their responsibility. Ms Nikau was a key player in the building contracts – she signed the building contracts and signed cheques when there was no money to pay them. As a result High Court proceedings were issued against the trustees and a $...

7. Practice Note applications under the protection of Personal and Property Rights Act [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...purpose of this Practice Note is to ensure that the Court has before it evidence: (a) relating to the merits of the application; (b) that the proposed appointee is a suitable appointee; (c) that the proposed appointee is capable of carrying out the responsibilities and duties required under the PPPR Act; and (d) to consider if there is any relevant overlap between the PPPR Act, the Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 1992 and the Intellectual Disability (Compulsor...

8. LCRO 49/2016 QG v WW (8 May 2018) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...Family Court’s record, and directly impact on his rights and interests and those of the twins’. He firmly disagrees that Ms BA’s application was appropriate. Mr QG perceives unfairness in the process, and considers Ms WW should be held responsible for her part in the curtailment of his and the twins’ rights and interests. [36] On 12 March 2015, Mr JR filed a memorandum with the Family Court recording Mr QG’s position on the inaccuracies he alleged were recorded in the C...

9. MBL v Shadforth [2016] NZIACDT 26 (18 May 2016) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...often significant in terms of professional disciplinary matters may fall outside the course of providing immigration advice. For example, a licensed immigration adviser could be dishonest outside of their practice. [14] The Tribunal requested responses on the issue. The Registrar’s view is that the grounds of Mr MBL’s complaint fall within the broad definition of “immigration advice”, and accordingly are within the scope of section 44(1). However, her position is that she...

10. Piper v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 408) & Ors [2017] NZREADT 32 [pdf, 239 KB]

    ...Preliminary observation [3] We observe, as a preliminary matter, that the Tribunal was provided at the hearing with a great deal more information than was available to the Committee. The second respondents set out their complaints in detail, but the response of Mr Piper, in particular, was brief and lacked detail. Neither he nor Mr Ebert provided all the information they had that was relevant to the complaints. [4] As a result, the Authority did not have all the information that...