Search Results

1. NZCVS Cycle 3 (2020) Section 9 Perceptions of safety [xlsx, 120 KB]

   ...other hand, when the confidence intervals of two estimates do overlap, the difference between the estimates is described as not statistically significant. This is a more conservative approach than a formal statistical test. Don't know/refusal responses Residual response categories such as "don't know" and "don't wish to answer" are generally excluded from analysis. This is generally the case for analysis of victimisation and rates of reporting victimisations...

2. NZCVS-Cycle-5-Impact-of-COVID-Perceptions-of-safety.xlsx [xlsx, 121 KB]

   ...other hand, when the confidence intervals of two estimates do overlap, the difference between the estimates is described as not statistically significant. This is a more conservative approach than a formal statistical test. Don't know/refusal responses Residual response categories such as "don't know" and "don't wish to answer" are generally excluded from analysis. This is generally the case for analysis of victimisation and rates of reporting victimisations...

3. NZCVS-Cycle-5-Impact-of-COVID-Perceptions-of-safety-v2 [xlsx, 121 KB]

   ...other hand, when the confidence intervals of two estimates do overlap, the difference between the estimates is described as not statistically significant. This is a more conservative approach than a formal statistical test. Don't know/refusal responses Residual response categories such as "don't know" and "don't wish to answer" are generally excluded from analysis. This is generally the case for analysis of victimisation and rates of reporting victimisations...

4. [2023] NZEnvC 193 Brial v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 5.3 MB]

   ...is� for� the� design� and� execution� of� the� engineering� works� and� construction� works� required� in� association� with� this� development�and�shall�confirm�that�these�representatives�will�be�responsible�for�all�aspects�of�the� works� covered�under�Sections�1.7�&�1.8�of�QLDC’s� Land�Development� and�Subdivision�Code�of� Practice,�in�relation�to�this�development.� � 5.� Pri...

5. LCRO 15/2023 and LCRO 21/2023 OE v CN (13 February 2025) [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...managed the payments to me, (for which he was paid), he should have been aware that interest would be incurred. 6. This failure by Mr. CN over a four year period to sort this out has, I believe, caused me a loss in excess of $30,000.00. Mr CN’s response [21] Mr CN provided further background information to the events giving rise to Mr OE’s complaints:2 2 Letter CN to Lawyers Complaints Service (23 August 2021). 4 (a) Mr CN acted for the liquidator to obtain judgment ag...

6. [2025] NZEmpC 98 The Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki - Ministry for Children v Hill [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...to Ms Hill setting out his factual findings and his preliminary view that she should be dismissed without notice. The allegation was essentially the same as had been in Oranga Tamariki’s 15 March 2021 letter.32 [36] Ms Hill’s 25 March 2021 responses are recorded in the letter, including that she did not consider she had M in a strangling or choking motion. There is no mention of the strangling or choking matter when discussing the findings of fact.33 [37] In terms of the findi...

7. Thomas v Ministry of Social Development [2024] NZHRRT 63 [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...provided. I am looking to you to help me with information. Enclosed is a notice that clarifies legal issues and obligations that you have under our social welfare laws. This notice is approved by the Privacy Commissioner and means we meet our legal responsibilities. I would appreciate it if you could treat this matter in confidence and send your response directly to me at the address provided below before 21 July 2012. [5] On 28 November 2012 MSD interviewed Ms Hawe. MSD intern...

8. 2018 archive

   ...are exempt from the out of court process.” At FLAS stage 1 the purpose is to advise clients of what to expect in the family justice system so matters can be resolved out-of-court. At stage 2 the purpose is to assist in filling out forms or notices of response for parenting or guardianship orders. We do not consider advice on proceedings involving OT would fit the description of either stage. If you have any questions about this, please contact the Provider Services (Legal Aid) team at legalai...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. Lawyers & service providers >
   3. Legal aid lawyers >
   4. Whats New for lawyers providing Legal Aid

9. Wellington Standards Committee 2 v Hay [2018] NZLCDT 1 [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...that Mr Hay had represented to her that the loan was specifically for a property development in Queenstown. Mr Hay says that the loan was not “tied” to any particular project.” [17] While this was Mr Hay’s evidence at the hearing, in his responses to the NZLS both in February 2015 and September 2016 Mr Hay clearly stated that the funds were to be applied towards the purchase and development of a property in Queenstown and that Mr Skinner had informed Ms C of such purpose. [...

10. [2007] NZEmpC CC 14/07 Kostic v Dodd and Milligan [pdf, 130 KB]

    ...the employer was that Mr Dodd spoke in a mild voice to Mr Kostic who immediately became enraged and launched a torrent of abuse and threats directed at Mr Dodd. Mr Kostic agreed that he had become angry and swore but said that he did so only in response to Mr Dodd remonstrating with him unjustifiably and swearing at him. [27] The case for the employer was that, in the course of this exchange, Mr Kostic resigned his employment. Mr Kostic denied this. [28] Following this exchange...