Search Results

1. Practice Note 2023 [pdf, 301 KB]

   ...the Court’s questions. (i) Where matters of primary fact are in issue, the Court may require the evidence-in- chief of any witness to be given orally by question and answer. 8.4. Rebuttal evidence (a) Rebuttal evidence may only be called in response to evidence that could not reasonably have been anticipated. That may include: i. addressing a matter which could not reasonably have been foreseen before the witness was called or exchanged their statement of evidence; or ii. whe...

2. OIA-111348.pdf [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...briefings or completed forms in relation to deciding on the form and scope of consultation regarding Commitment 7 of New Zealand's fourth National Action Plan as a member of the Open Government Partnership. 3) A copy of all submissions received in response to the Ministry's recent consultation on Commitment 7 of New Zealand's fourth National Action Plan as a member of the Open Government Partnership. 4) A copy of all correspondence and meetings notes and presentations s...

3. Tranche-4-of-Cabinet-and-Ministerial-advice-on-changes-to-clubs-and-ranges-regulations.pdf [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...without the enabling regulations. Police also raised concerns about the fee waiver for temporary non-pistol ranges and requested a comment in the Cabinet paper. 9. Your response to these concerns is in the Cabinet paper. You will also find suggested responses in the talking points below if these concerns are raised during the meeting. 10. Based on feedback from Treasury we added a financial implications section to the Cabinet paper. Based on feedback from the Ministry of Regulation, we...

4. Smith v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work-related gradual process injury) [2025] NZACC 189 [pdf, 463 KB]

   ...the injury had been caused by “progressive symptoms compartment syndrome due to work activities including shearing.” [15] Investigating the claim, the Corporation arranged for Mr Smith to complete a Client Cover Questionnaire. Mr Smith’s responses are noted as part of his evidence in this judgment. [16] The claim was referred to Dr Sprott, occupational physician and Principal Clinical Advisor, who reported on 5 August 2022, following review of Mr Smith’s questionnaire answ...

5. [2011] NZEmpC 145 Te Runanga O Kirikiriroa Trust Incorporated v Allen [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...ARC 122/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN TE RUNANGA O KIRIKIRIROA TRUST INCORPORATED Plaintiff AND MALLORY ALLEN Defendant Hearing: (on the papers in response to memoranda dated 29 September 2011 and 7 October 2011 and telephone directions conference on 21 October 2011) Counsel: Alex Hope, counsel for the plaintiff Rose Alchin, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 3 November 2011...

6. [2010] NZEmpC 157 Ingham (Labour Inspector) v August Models & Talent Ltd [pdf, 18 KB]

   ...breach of a s 137 compliance order, as the Authority’s was, is a sum not exceeding $40,000: s 140(6)(d) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). [8] Compliance orders should not be flouted, as I am satisfied has been the defendant’s response to that which was made by the Authority, served on the defendant and otherwise brought to its attention. There is no suggestion that it is unable to pay its debts by reason of impecuniosity. Had that been so, the Court would have...

7. CJARS - claim form [pdf, 322 KB]

   ...If you are not a witness, what is your relationship with the witness? Part 3: Event details (when and where the loss or damage occurred) When did the loss / damage happen? / / (day / month / year) Where did it happen? How did it happen? Who was/were responsible for the event / loss? What action did you take to recover your property or reduce your loss? Who did you notify about the event / loss? (You may tick more than one) The Police at ____________...

8. Pavic v CAC306 & Anor [2015] NZREADT 84 [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...respondent filed witness statements on 24 September 2015 and opening submissions on 22 October 2015, but Ms Pavic has not complied with any timetable. [7] By email of 20 November 2015 Ms Pavic advised that she was not available on 9 December 2015. By response email of 20 November 2015, this Registry advised Ms Pavic that, if she wished to seek an adjournment of the hearing on 9 December 2015, she needed to set out the full position in an email to all parties by 5.00 pm Tuesday, 24 No...

9. AK v Secretary for Justice 6 August 2012 NZRA 000013 [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...respect of additional information supplied to the Review Authority and not included in the original application for approval, the applicant should be required to reapply to the Secretary for approval. 15. The applicant answered the Secretary’s response on 25 July in which: a. He clarified criticisms of his examples of work samples noting that he had provided 6 examples of involvement in trials on indictment 2 of which were re-trials. b. He refers to another PC 3 matter of agg...

10. ACM Ltd v ZXS [2013] NZDT 113 (17 June 2013) [pdf, 55 KB]

    ...the email to ZXS dated 12 December 2012). His email on 14 December repeated this, specifying that they would expect to be able to furnish the report by 20 January 2012 “as long as we can get access to the property from your lessee”. ZXS’s response in his return email was: “If you can do it till around 20 of Jan 2013, I am fine.” [5] KP from ACM Ltd carried out the inspection on Friday 18 January, as this was the earliest date his lessee would allow him access. The repo...