Search Results

1. 2021-10-27 ORC - PC8 - Common Bundle - Volume 3(b) [pdf, 13 MB]

   ...Table of Contents Part 1 Wāhi Tuatahi – He Kupu Whakataki Introduction 23 1.1 Introduction 23 1.2 Kaupapa of this Plan 24 1.3 Why the need for review of our existing iwi management plan 28 1.4 Purpose of this Plan 28 1.5 Roles and Responsibilities 29 1.6 Manawhenua�/�Manamoana 29 1.7 Scope of this Plan 30 1.8 Methodology for Developing this Plan 30 1.9 Relationship with other Plans and Policies 31 1.10 Who should use this Plan 31 1.11 How to use this Plan 3...

2. [2023] NZEmpC 105 Pilgrim & Ors v Attorney-General & Ors [pdf, 596 KB]

   ...community with a strict hierarchy. The Overseeing Shepherd is the principal leader. He is described in Community documentation as a star held in the right hand of the Lord Jesus, the angel of the Church – a messenger. The Overseeing Shepherd is responsible to Christ and Christ alone. He is ordained and appointed by the previous leader who, in turn, ordains and appoints the next Overseeing Shepherd. The future Overseeing Shepherd remains subject to the discipline of the curren...

3. ASC - 2015 annual report [pdf, 828 KB]

   ...(a) Because a small number of women are provided with more than one type of contraceptive, contraceptives provided total more than the number of abortions. (b) 'Referred to general practitioner' or 'referred for vasectomy' responses are in the 'none' category. (c) Oral Contraceptives includes combined oral contraceptives and progestrone only contraceptives. (d) 'Other' contraceptives are largely condoms or condoms with the emergency contraceptiv...

4. [2007] NZEmpC CC 3/07 Peoples v Accident Compensation Corporation [pdf, 63 KB]

   ...involved. That would be consistent with what she says in paragraph 59 of her affidavit that she represented herself before the Authority as a “cost saving measure.” Having elected to proceed in this way, Ms Peoples must be taken to have assumed responsibility for knowing what her rights and responsibilities as a litigant were. In such circumstances, it is not a convincing explanation for delay that it took Ms Peoples more than a month from 14 June to 13 July 2006 to find out...

5. [2007] NZEmpC CC 24A/07 Service and Food Workers Union v Alsco NZ [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...there could be no room for misunderstanding with regard to what was intended. (emphasis added) [10] The solicitors also countered the other challenges to the legality of the notices raised by the union. The remainder of Alsco’s solicitors’ response was equally blunt. It advised that its client “has absolutely no intention of withdrawing the Notice of Lockout, and will vigorously defend any injunction proceedings sought. Frankly, our client considers your claim to be frivolo...

6. [2011] NZEmpC 165 O’Connor v Ports of Auckland Ltd [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...anything further that he wished to say in relation to the matters raised at the earlier meeting. Mr Phillips accepted on Mr O‟Connor‟s behalf that the incident reflected an error of judgment but submitted that dismissal was not an appropriate response. Reference was made by Mr Ward to three previous warnings having been issued against Mr O‟Connor. In fact there had only been two. That error was corrected by Mr O‟Connor, who said that only one was still in place. This was...

7. [2010] NZEmpC 22 The Chief of Defence Force v Ross-Taylor [pdf, 55 KB]

   ...unreasonably withheld. • Clause 6.4 allowed the defendant to change rostered sessions placing the responsibility on her to find a replacement from a Navy Hospital approved list of locums providers. • Clauses 6.5 and 11.2 made the respondent responsible for maintaining at her cost relevant registration, practicing certificates and professional indemnity insurance. • Clause 10 required the defendant to submit invoices for services performed and made her respo...

8. [2006] NZEmpC WC 27/06 ANZ National Bank v Cortright [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...coverage clause was incorrect. [9] The bank disputes these findings. Terms of employment [10] Mr Cortright’s 1999 letter of employment contained his terms and conditions of employment. It incorporated a document called “ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT” which describes his position functions. As a senior analyst programmer his key responsibilities are to develop, enhance, maintain, and support the more complex retail banking mainframe applications. According...

9. [2012] NZEmpC 173 Gilbert v The Attorney-General in respect of the CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...long ago as 2005 endeavouring to resolve the issue but received no response, as did the plaintiff personally to the Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Corrections on a number of occasions after January 2008. Mr Gilbert says that the responses given to him were belated and, finally, amounted to an election by the defendant to await the judgment so that no meeting occurred. Mr Gilbert says that he agreed to attempt to mediate the parties’ differences with a retired High Co...

10. [2013] NZEmpC 18 Pathways Health Ltd v Moxon [pdf, 112 KB]

    ...find that it was not unreasonable for the defendant to reject the plaintiff’s offer of 11 November 2010. I also find that this was a significant part of the actual reason why the defendant rejected that offer. This is abundantly clear from the response given to the offer in its initial form – see the parts of her response bullet pointed above in paragraph [22]. [31] Although not necessary to do so, I find that it was also not unreasonable for the defendant to reject the moneta...