KV v TE LCRO 39/12 (15 June 2015) [pdf, 66 KB]
...the New Zealand Law Society (NZLS). [5] Mr KV sought to rely on the affidavit, and wanted information from Mr TE, or whichever of his colleagues had prepared it, about its purpose, meaning and origins. He made enquiries of Mr TE but received no response. [6] Mr KV says he wrote to NZLS in August and September 2011 about Mr TE failing to provide information, and asking whether he could claim a refund of the fees he had paid because Mr TE had lost his trial. [7] He followed that...