Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 033 Burkhart Fisheries Limited v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...reasons outlined in our initial submission on the application". [5] The s 274 notice is filed 93 working days outside of the prescribed time limit. There are no reasons given in the application for the delay in filing , although by way of response to the appellant's opposition , MEC later gave the following reasons: ' (a) MEC is a voluntary group of concerned Marlborough residents. During the period the appeal was lodged Mr Tim Newsham, secretary for MEC, was away for...

2. Kool v Joyce - Tapui Residue (2016) 143 Taitokerau MB 145 (143 TTK 145) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...As such, on 14 December 2016, I issued the following directions: I direct the Registrar to urgently contact Ben Joyce, advise him of the application and provide a copy of the application and supporting material to him. Mr Joyce is to file any response by 5:00pm Monday 19 December 2016. I will then make a determination on the papers as to whether an interim injunction should be granted preventing Mr Joyce from entering the block or undertaking further works pending determination...

3. Schedule 2 to The Hon Ian Callinan AC’s Report [pdf, 931 KB]

   ...2: NOTES OF THE MEETING AND DATES OF WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS Dates of written submissions Crown's overview: 31 March 2015 Applicant's overview: 12 May 2015 Applicant's statement of claim and submissions: 25 May 2015 Crown's response to Applicant's claim: 8 June 2015 Applicant's submissions in reply: 16 June 2015 David Bain Compensation Claim for Wrongful Conviction and Imprisonment Summary of meeting held before Hon Ian Callinan AC QC between lOam an...

4. 2021-05-03 ORC - MOC - evidence in reply and relating timetable matters [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...questioning and cross-examination of Mr De Pelsemaeker and parties’ closing submissions. Mr De Pelsemaeker’s evidence-in-reply 7 Mr De Pelsemaeker’s evidence-in-reply will address the following matters: (a) Proposed amendments to PC7 in response to evidence of parties, including the JWS; 1 As set out in the Minute dated 28 April 2020 Counsel, having conferred with parties, will within 2 working days of receipt of the JWS’s, file a Memorandum of Counsel confirming the...

5. 2021 NZPSPLA 012.pdf [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...says that the first rule of the Head Hunters is that a member is not to give statements to or interact or give assistance to the Police in any inquiry or investigation against either friend or foe. He says this directly conflicts with Mr Kaveinga’s responsibilities as a certificate holder. People working in security are required to work closely with the Police in keeping the peace and by assisting them in their investigations. Sergeant Gallagher says that rather than working cooperati...

6. [2021] NZEnvC 057 Pipers Limited Partnership v Auckland Council [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...Environment Judge MJL Dickey Submissions: Mr R Bartlett QC for the Appellants Ms D Hartley for the Auckland Council Mr P Sinton for the Kumeu-Huapai Residents and Ratepayers Association Last case event: Waiver application dated 27 April 2021 and responses to the waiver application dated 29 April 2021 Date of Decision: 30 April 2021 Date of Issue: 30 April 2021 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ON AN APPLICATION FOR WAIVER The application for waiver is granted. The Kumeu-Huapai...

7. Jury service - response to jury summons previously deferred form [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   Response to previously deferred jury summons Tell us if you are coming to jury service Your legal duty is to do jury service. You can also apply to be excused, but only for special reasons. Please choose 1 of the options below:  I am coming to jury service Thank you. You’re helping your community Please complete and send page 1 and page 2 I can’t do jury service You can be excused from jury service for special reasons. Please complete and send page 1 and page 4 Give...

8. Bisschoff v Yerman [2016] NZIACDT 44 (30 August 2016) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...in New Zealand Immigration Advice (Level 7). [4] Ms Bisschoff sought a refund of fees of $6,372.95, plus costs of $189.08, a total of $6,562.03. The costs related to parking, and lost earnings for Mr Bisschoff to attend the hearing. Ms Yerman’s response [5] Aside from Ms Yerman’s response after the decision, I note that at the hearing of this complaint and when addressing sanctions in respect of another complaint, the Tribunal had the opportunity of assessing Ms Yerman’s intentio...

9. Map of application area Whanau a Kahu [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...since 1840 Mana Motuhake & Rangatiratanga Exercising Mana Motuhake and Rangatiratanga acknowledging shared interests, activities and uses in areas in question combined with obligation to tikanga of our hapu. These beliefs & responsibilities are inherited from our tipuna, include: • self determination • self management • self governance • kaitiakitanga • Pikitanga a Kauwhakatuakina Marae, • Karakatuwhero tidal river & estuary, • Fr...

10. Western Bay of Plenty Distrisc Council v Clarke - Te Puke 1A24 (2007) 318 Rotorua MB 140 (318 ROT 140) [pdf, 1 MB]

    ...reservation was granted by this Comt and it is interesting to note that the Court at that time advised Noah Karaka and Petipeti Karaka in the following terms: "do you appreciate that this does not automaticafly give you J'(~Jieffj-om rating. Response - t111e. " [6J The rates were not paid and the Applicant District Council obtained judgements against the respondents, on the 1 st of August 2006 for the amount of $19,056.49 together with costs, which bought the amount o...