LCRO 199/2018 EJ v AP and XG (6 March 2019) [pdf, 92 KB]
...It is accepted that Mr EJ found the family court process and his former wife’s part in that upsetting. It is also accepted that he is genuinely affronted by Ms AP’s part in events. However, it is not accepted that Ms AP is professionally responsible for the sense of outrage Mr EJ displays. Ms AP’s conduct fell well within the usual parameters expected of lawyers acting for clients in similar circumstances. [10] The evidence does not support findings that Ms AP: (a) contra...