Search Results

1. Relief Coroner position pofile 01.11.21 [docx, 28 KB]

   ...Ministry of Justice · NZ Police · Pathologists · Specialist advisors in cultural, legal, medical or other fields · Other government departments and agencies, such as Civil Defence · News media · Mortality Review Committees Other Bodies responsible for investigating deaths directly or accidents where death has occurred in New Zealand, including the Independent Police Conduct Authority, Maritime Safety Authority, Civil Aviation Authority and Transport Accident Investigation Commissi...

2. [2021] NZEnvC 177 Campbell's Block Limited v Southland Regional Council [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...appellants and continue to seek the removal of “or 100 hectares, whichever is the lesser area” from Rule 20(a)(iii)(1). (i) There is no reason for this court to exercise its discretion to allow the withdrawal despite this opposition. Party responses to notice of motion [6] No party has opposed the notice of motion. Consideration [7] An appellant does not require leave from the court to withdraw or abandon their appeal.1 The court cannot compel a party to continue with a...

3. Relief Coroner position pofile [docx, 28 KB]

   ...Ministry of Justice · NZ Police · Pathologists · Specialist advisors in cultural, legal, medical or other fields · Other government departments and agencies, such as Civil Defence · News media · Mortality Review Committees Other Bodies responsible for investigating deaths directly or accidents where death has occurred in New Zealand, including the Independent Police Conduct Authority, Maritime Safety Authority, Civil Aviation Authority and Transport Accident Investigation Commissi...

4. [2021] NZSSAA 5 (5 March 2021) [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...said that the Rise Hostel was not suitable as she needed full kitchen facilities to meet her daughter’s dietary needs. She said that her daughter would only eat fish and chicken and could only ‘stomach’ food that was cooked in an oven. In response to questions from Mr Hunt the appellant said that the microwave and stove top cooking provided at the Rise Hostel were not adequate. She said that her daughter ended up sick and ‘spewing up’ after five days in emergency accomm...

5. KG v OAU [2022] NZDT 225 (29 November 2022) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...occurred in this case. TQ agreed that OAU owed a duty of care to warn motorists or repair potholes that it had knowledge of, but in this case OAU had no knowledge of the pothole and therefore could not have repaired it. 9. OAU have a statutory responsibility for the repair and maintenance of the roads. That is one of OAU’s statutory functions and is one that is determined by parliament. In specified circumstances, it may be that OAU had a duty of care to warn motorists of a haza...

6. BD v ET [2019] NZDT 1677 (21 November 2021) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] As BD was getting his car out of his garage he collided with a car which had been parked by ET in a blind spot in his driveway. BD’s car was damaged as a result. ET immediately accepted responsibility for her car having been in BD’s driveway when it should not have been. She signed an acknowledgement of liability for the collision. [2] Both BD and ET were insured but ET’s insurer Insurance Company B considers BD to...

7. [2022] NZACC 95 - Watson v ACC (19 May 2022) [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...time and set out the reasons why the appeal was filed late. Judge Spiller directed that Ms Watson file a memorandum formally applying for leave to appeal out of time, with supporting reasons, by 11 May 2022; the Corporation file a memorandum in response by 25 May 2022; and Ms Watson will file a brief memorandum in reply by 1 June 2022. [3] On 12 May 2022, Ms Koloni submitted that the appeal was filed late because of a misunderstanding on when the 28-day period started, not understa...

8. [2021] NZACC 87 - Duncan v ACC (18 June 2021) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...had not been in contact and the latest address on file was [stated], the same address held by the Registry. The last recorded contact record was when the Corporation sent a decision letter in January 2020 to the above address, but there was no response. A claim had been made on the Appellant's behalf in December 2019, but contact was with the hospital only. The last successful contact on record was in November 2017 for a review teleconference. • On 29 January 2021, the Re...

9. NO Ltd v JL Ltd & SI [2021] NZDT 1342 (19 January 2021) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...District Court [2021] NZDT 1342 APPLICANT NO Ltd RESPONDENT JL Limited SECOND RESPONDENT SI The Tribunal orders: SI is liable to pay NO Limited $4,156.98 on or before 20 February 2021. Reasons 1. SI accepts responsibility for a vehicle accident that caused damage to one of NO’s power poles in May last year. NO says it has cost $5,196.23 (including GST) to repair the damage SI caused and claims this sum from him. SI is insured with JL. Li...

10. 2023 NZPSPLA 009.pdf [pdf, 123 KB]

    ...ensure he has sufficient abilities to deal with presenting situations. They have attempted to give him work at other localities to minimise the impact of his presence on Ms K and only send him to Pak n Save when they are short staffed. [8] In response to the complaint, they say they went through the video footage they could access from the site. They spoke with Mr Ape and they approached the checkout managers at Pak n Save. None of the managers were aware of any complaints or any i...